Yes, think it as a set, like how Artifacts were in their slots. I also explained that in fights and examples, Garrosh/Varok/Sylvanas dualwielded, so that counts as one weapon.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @Aernath @Skoll_Shorties
In Thrall's case against Garrosh's two weapons, he wielded Doomhammer and Elements in the first fight, that's equalizing the count as an Enhancement Shaman. But in the final fight, he started only with Doomhammer against Garrosh's Gorehowl and never used Elements until the end.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Aernath
I don't think the two have to match-up with what they're fighting with. Multiple times Thrall and Garrosh have fought each other inside and outside of a Mak'gora with the elements still playing a part. And in those matches, Garrosh still came close to winning. (1/2)
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @Aernath
Garrosh fully well knew that Thrall was going to wield the elements again in their final battle in AU Nagrand and probably thought once again he'd win and this time end Thrall. If he truly didn't want Thrall to wield the elements we both know Thrall would abide by that. (2/2)
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
Without getting into "What if"s, what we have there comes down to what's honorable and fair, that's the basis of Mak'gora; a "Duel of Honor". What happened in first fights between Garrosh and Thrall was: When fight was "fair" and equal, Garrosh was winning, 1/2
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Aernath @Skoll_Shorties
But both of those fights got interrupted with external reasons. At Nagrand though, what Thrall did was not fair, that's why it is cheating, not because of magic, but because he used magic unfairly, even he himself knows it and feels guilty about it. 2/2 (bonus self quote ;b)pic.twitter.com/paXgnUPOmm
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Aernath
I view that Garrosh saw the weapon that Thrall was holding but knew he wasn't going to use it right away. Thrall is a shaman and him wielding the elements is no secret. Garry has defeated Thrall despite those elemental powers and had no issue with him using it because of that.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @Aernath
He's not going to have a surprise Pikachu Face when fighting Thrall and all of a sudden Thrall starts using the elements when he's about to lose. That's extremely practical and honestly expected for a fight that they've had MULTIPLE TIMES NOW.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @Aernath
I would only say Thrall cheated if Garrosh said no elemental powers and that they were only allowed one weapon. The fact of the matter is one weapon is not an over-arching rule it's a rule you can give if you want to which clearly neither of them have said in previous matches.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
Difference is being disarmed, at first they were equally weaponized, but when Thrall used Elements they were both disarmed and in fist fight. Remember the Wowpedia quote, you can't pick up a dropped weapon or a new weapon. Not because of a rule, because it's a "Duel of Honor".
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
He didn't drop the elements - you can't physically drop something like that. He dropped the Doomhammer which is a completely different weapon from the elements entirely. We're done here.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
You are really bad at this you know :) I never said he dropped Elements either, if he always had Elements, then why didn't he start with that? Not because of scene, because he was trying to fight fair. But when he got pinned down, weaponless, he: Cheated. By using Elements :)
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Aernath
Can you like... drop the passive-aggressive nature and the :) it's unsettling and doesn't help your case at all.
0 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony
Koniec rozmowy
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.