Możesz dodawać lokalizację do Twoich Tweetów, jak miasto czy konkretne miejsce, z sieci lub innych aplikacji. W każdej chwili możesz usunąć historię lokalizacji swoich Tweetów. Dowiedz się więcej
So you're still refusing to read and trying to stick to that eventhough I openly wrote it as how it is? I never said it's "the" rule, I said it's the "common" rule, means it exists in most fights. Again, let's keep pasting, this time a Wowpedia proof with some markers then :)pic.twitter.com/vTPK0XfRxt
I am reading what you're saying and once again it all factors down to the participants. Cairne and Garrosh stated one weapon in your example. In Wrath of the Lich King's pre-event Garrosh was allowed two weapons. More than one weapon is allowed if the fighters say so.
Yes, think it as a set, like how Artifacts were in their slots. I also explained that in fights and examples, Garrosh/Varok/Sylvanas dualwielded, so that counts as one weapon.
In Thrall's case against Garrosh's two weapons, he wielded Doomhammer and Elements in the first fight, that's equalizing the count as an Enhancement Shaman. But in the final fight, he started only with Doomhammer against Garrosh's Gorehowl and never used Elements until the end.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
