Skoll Shorties

Interesting. What are Ben's thoughts on the armistice then?

He respects Anduin as a King and believes in what he's trying to do, but he knows that he's not exactly coming from it from the perspective of someone who lost the most in the war. There's a good number of Horde members he respects, but he's ready to fight until amends are made.

Fight who? Surely it makes more sense to fight the actual person responsible than to chase a sense of justice that only causes more misery for everyone involved?

The Horde went right along with a lot of what Sylvanas did, just like they did with Garrosh. By the time there's a revolution in the Horde, huge damage is already done to the Alliance. Ben hasn't ignored that every time the Horde needs to find itself, Alliance innocents die.

This is something I see argued a lot within the community. "The Horde still sided with Sylvanas! They should answer for that!" I think that it's important to note not everyone was cool with Sylvanas and some did indeed take pleasure in what they did others didn't. (1/3)

Those that remained loyal to Sylvanas to the bitter end even when given a second chance either escaped/were locked up. Who does the Alliance intend to punish here exactly? The Horde currently in charge wants peace mainly while Sylvanas' goonies who're gone want war. (2/3)

This is definitely going to be a very difficult area for Blizzard to address. Mists of Pandaria and Battle for Azeroth seemingly were the end to the Cycle of Hatred but red flags are already starting to flap with Tyrande & even Talanji. This is gonna be tough for everyone. (3/3)

I agree for the most part. With Garrosh, it was easier to parse the change in the Horde, since it was a new plot that promised change. BFA seems to imply that things will just repeat the same as before. As much as I'd like to, I can't ignore what lead up to the rebellion.