I don't gain anything out of defending Blizzard's store mounts except for the occasional hate or harassment (which is rare because I'm small). I don't get money. I don't get famous. I don't even get that many likes for tweeting about it. I'm just saying my piece on the matter.pic.twitter.com/0ShiEm9sBH
-
From all the things I've seen about this topic, the problem people have are with having a cash shop in a game you need to both buy to play and purchase a subscription, not, "I can't afford it."
I don't really hear that argument that much but I've been mostly keeping my eye on twitter than the forums or on YouTube.
-
-
I mean its the biggest criticism of microtransactions in games, the notion of paying for a game twice over and still having a shop. Its unabashed money grubbing behavior. Especially with how insanely overpriced the WoW shop actually is.
-
One of my friends made a good point that WoW is still $15 a month and has been that way since 2004 and that hasn't changed. But the operating costs have gone up. So they could've charged us more a month or they give us optional mounts and pets that aren't a requirement.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.