I don't gain anything out of defending Blizzard's store mounts except for the occasional hate or harassment (which is rare because I'm small). I don't get money. I don't get famous. I don't even get that many likes for tweeting about it. I'm just saying my piece on the matter.pic.twitter.com/0ShiEm9sBH
-
My thing is, and has always been, mounts and other cosmetic items in a cash shop have NO place in a buy to play and mandatory subscription per month game.
The mounts aren't mandatory, however for a company like Blizzard in this day and age where they're not gonna get new players they can put mounts like that up for those who want to pay for it. Plus you can buy it with gold in-game.
-
-
I get the excuses and the justifications, but once more it’s a subscription based game. I know they aren’t mandatory but the sub is, and like I said for me atleast, that’s unacceptable.
-
I don't think we should put others down for not buying them or buying them. What I find unacceptable is how far people take it. I hardly ever see those who like the mounts spread hate but those that don't sadly do.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
-
-
I dont think the mounts are the biggest issue but this argument that, "you can just buy it with gold in-game" falls apart because there's still money transitioning to Blizzard in the transition, even if its not from you. It's from the person using the token.
-
That's fair but I just think that the issue can also stem from people saying, "I can't afford this." or something or other but they can at least afford it with the gold they've made in the game.
- Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.