Just saw a post on facebook, not gonna name names cause I ain't rude and I don't want people harassing them. But there is a person who believes the Zandalari and Talanji wouldn't side with the rebellion against Sylvanas. (1/3)
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
Considering the rebellion is working with the Alliance, her father's killers. Its understandable why some would believe that.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @arcturionn
Yes, but at the sametime, the poster was somebody who heavily dislikes Baine and Sylvanas and is intentionally avoiding the fact that the rebels are in the right and that it's perfectly fine for Talanji to help *them* not the Alliance.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
I wouldn't say they are "In the right". Even if it was dishonorable, Sylvanas' goal was to keep the kul tiran fleet from dominating the seas. Baine pretty much allowed the Alliance to maintain the naval advantage AND his actions could have led to increased Alliance attacks.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @arcturionn
Baine's act in saving Derek is controversial but it went against Sylvanas' own codes that she established for the Forsaken about free will. Baine -HAD- to do something about this and he was going to be executed for it. --
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @arcturionn
By killing Baine she would've ended what the Horde was about, its very identity and its values. Sylvanas has been breaking these values and been ignoring the Horde's customs the entirety of BfA. In my eyes the Horde that Thrall, Baine, and Saurfang represent is the right one.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 3 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
Sylvanas' goal is the Horde' survival and she doesn't hesitate to cross lines to achieve them. As much as I hate defending her, the logic is sound(Something Saurfang himself agreed to in A Good War). Philosophically? I agree TeamSaurfang show the honor of the Horde. (1/2)
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @arcturionn
Sylvanas' goal is no longer about the Horde's survival. Maybe at one point it was but she willingly had the Horde's forces flushed down Naz'jatar to remove the "disloyal". Not only that but she also had her own forces blighted to death in the fight for Lordaeron.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
Source? I may be able to get some insight if I get more details. For now I'll just say that its likely she's getting paranoid. First in Before the Storm some forsaken sought to abandon the Horde, then Baine put the Horde at risk. (1/2)
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @arcturionn @Skoll_Shorties
(2/2) From what I recall from the Battle of Lordaeron, the majority of the Horde forces in the front were already dead. Horde players could rescue survivors if they chose.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
They were either dead, dying, or troops trying to save those that were dying. Still scummy, still irredeemable.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
So they were going to die either way, Sylvanas sacrificed them to buy time and save those that could yet be saved.
0 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionychDziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.