Name one justified reason why any of them should be upset with any policy sylvanas has enacted.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @GnomeBone
1. She used the plague on her troops and the Alliance. 2. She is killing innocent civilians, children even (Teldrassil being the big one here.) 3. She broke her one rule and code of a Forsaken by stripping Derek of his free will in order to kill the Proudmoores.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 2 polubione -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @GnomeBone
4. She sent assassins to kill Thrall and potentially his family when he was just minding his business in Nagrand staying out of her business. This drives him to get involved.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
Also assassinating your political rivals is absolutely justified when you know your subordinates are directly conspiring against you
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @GnomeBone
Thrall is not a political rival. He's a retired father who is done with the Horde and done with Azeroth. She had no right to send assassins after him like she did with Saurfang. I like Saurfang and I sided with him but he was a traitor. Thrall was not.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
If you had a former leader who in the past has usurped people who he considered to be doing bad things and you were doing things he disagreed with would you not feel threatened by that person???
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @GnomeBone
Probably. But Vol'jin also threatened to kill Garrosh and Garrosh had every reason to kill him privately. Saurfang also threatened to kill Sylvanas should she be another Garrosh. Thrall never threatened her and clearly, again, wanted nothing to do with her and the Horde.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
You cant know another person's inner thoughts so it's pointless to say "thrall doesnt care" Thrall, in the past, has interjected himself in political matters where he was to be retired. why not assume the same person to do the same thing. best remove them
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @GnomeBone
Because in the cinematic they make it clear that Thrall is undecided on whether or not he wants to help out against Sylvanas. He makes his decision only when his life and his family's are endangered.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
wow if only sylvanas could read his mind and not only be able to base predictions of future actions on all the past actions of any individual
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Sylvanas quite literally created her own enemy by trying to kill Thrall. She's created her own second rebellion. Despite not wanting to end up as another Garrosh she's done exactly that.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.