Probably something like that. I would like for an Alliance aggressor as it does get super tiring to see the Horde start every conflict.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
I think suddenly having an Alliance aggressor would be really out of nowhere, maybe when they inevitably bring over the Light Nazis, but the entire storyline thusfar has been the Horde and Sylvanas are the aggressors.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Necroxis9
I mean Garrosh made Jaina no longer really want peace with the Horde, though now she is finally healing and is becoming rather open again. Sylvanas ultimately did the same to Tyrande, however Tyrande has always been in an on and off relationship with the Horde.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties @Necroxis9
I just think it wouldn't be bad to tie in the events of BfA, especially with Teldrassil, for Tyrande to not forgive the Horde and continue her vengeance against them. We've not really seen the side effects the Nightwarriors causes
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
How many more ways do you want the Night Elves to be destroyed? They get wiped out, half their characters given to the Horde, not even included in the Azshara patch (Shandris' nonsense aside) and then want them to become the next villains?
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Necroxis9 @Skoll_Shorties
I think maybe if BfA thusfar hadn't been the genocide of their people, loss of two interesting character to the Horde, and exclusion from an important storyline for them, then sure. But I think making them be villains halfway through BfA would be the final straw for many people.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Necroxis9
I mean I'll be blunt I never found Sira very interesting. Delaryn, on the other hand, I can agree that she's an interesting character. But I think making this as Tyrande's continuation in the next expansion adds up given her stance on Teldrassil.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
Interesting may not be the best word, but she was still a rather important secondary character that existed since Cataclysm. A new Night Elf character that wasn't a RTS hold over. One that became leader of the Wardens. Fought Ragnaros, went to Draenor, led in Legion. Stolen.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Necroxis9
I guess that's fair. I really didn't like the Darkshore storyline that much as Horde for me it felt something only a Forsaken, Blood Elf, Goblin or Death Knight might take joy in. I kind of wish if you said, "No" to Nathanos that delay would allow Sira to be spared or saved.
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
If they really need Forsaken Night Elves, I would have been totally cool with and really liked if Sylvanas pulled a Gul'dan and basically created her own Death Knight-esque Dark Wardens by forcibly stealing Wisps and putting them into dead bodies.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
That would've been interesting and tie Sylvanas as another Arthas once again.
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @Skoll_Shorties
The "Sylvanas is now Arthas" comparison was already complete with the burning of Teldrassil. Repeating that story literally beat for beat by then resurrecting a new Sylvanas (Delaryn) to be her servant was just way too much.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @Necroxis9
I'm hoping they push more of that into the story. I know there's a lot you don't like in BfA but that's something I like that they've been showing. I like these nods and references to Arthas that especially ring with Sylvanas a lot.
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych - Pokaż odpowiedzi
Nowa rozmowa -
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.