Możesz dodawać lokalizację do Twoich Tweetów, jak miasto czy konkretne miejsce, z sieci lub innych aplikacji. W każdej chwili możesz usunąć historię lokalizacji swoich Tweetów. Dowiedz się więcej
Its what we would interpret to be 1000 years more advanced based on our current advancements now. What happens when you hit a peak or youve made the most of your advancements and cant go any further? 1000 years is just a guess in my opinion.
A rediculously low numerical guess based on the age of the universe. A guess that coincides with humans technological trajectory.
Exactly, we are still using fuel for propulsion and need wings to fly. From what others have seen these dont and may alter physics as we know it. Maybe thats more like 50 thousand or so years ahead. To 0 out gravity requires serious science beyond what we are capable of.
What makes you think there is legitimate predictor of how many years something is advanced if we don't know what it is or how it works? Taking them literally is semantics. They are trying to explain things to the general public. Should they say 1M years ahead of us? No difference
Do you understand the kind of technology we're talking about at 1000 years. That might as well be a million years, we progress and advance technologically and an exponential rate its ridiculously fast and some say faster than we should be. That's just a guess anyways, and
It does not at all narrow the scope of this to humans, although I am VERY open to the idea of the private sector making a breakthrough somewhere considering my great grandpa's inventions and we're nobodies. So imagine some other people put there
UAP Vehicles only a mere 50 years more advanced than non classified publically recognized military hardware must be piloted by ET? Based on the low end of Lou's assesment the liklihood is experimental corporate controlled tested black budget human crafts.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.
