Oh, go ahead and give it a try. I'm sure everyone would enjoy a good laugh.
-
-
Replying to @Awithonelison @AdiMano2 and
1 in 28 children disagree with you, baby killer.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm sure that made sense to you when you tweeted it, but it just seems unhinged and apropos of nothing to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @Awithonelison @yattypat and
Made sense to me. I guess you're just not bright enough/too brainwashed to get it.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdiMano2 @Awithonelison and
Science says otherwise. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vsd/publications.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @KarenMccartny @Awithonelison and
The "CDC" and "science" are not synonymous, by any means. What you mean is. "The CDC says otherwise".
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdiMano2 @KarenMccartny and
the CDC basis recommendations and comments on science.
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @mcfunny @KarenMccartny and
Questionable science with manipulated results.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdiMano2 @KarenMccartny and
not at all! you say that, but provide no evidence to support that! You make this up.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @mcfunny @KarenMccartny and
Well, the fact that they recommend highly ineffective vaccines, ignoring the facts, is an obvious start. Ie, flu/mumps, hep B for newborns. When you look into it, only a total fool would not see that.
6 replies 0 retweets 1 like
You consider the measles vax at 97% effectiveness to be ineffective? Measles 88%? Even the least effective (influenza) is far better at preventing disease than no protection at all. At the very least, if you get influenza, it will be milder than without the vax.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.