Without information about what the scale means (much less assumptions), this is not just useless, it is dangerous.
In response to inquiries: Rough simulation (Sept15-29) of #radio-isotope cloud from hypothetical atmospheric burst over Pacific: #CTBT #IMSpic.twitter.com/361ZBkoUy7
-
-
-
Simply a rough simulation of potential cloud that cld carry isotopes! In response to specific inquiries and nothing more.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is completely incorrect and just creates fear. No info on yield, radioactivity levels. Probably created to be picked up by media right.
-
: Clearly said in response to inquiries. You're welcome to visit us in Vienna & learn more about our verification regime. W/Thx
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
and why people around world have cancer ??? because rusia, usa, china, france... had made thousands nuclear tests ... thousands !!!!
-
and what about leaking Fukushima ???
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Si alguien detonara bomba nuclear en atmósfera sobre Pacífico Norte, así se propagaria nube de isótopos (
@SinaZerbo)pic.twitter.com/p03HO4x9xS - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You need to provide info on yield & altitude for this to be meaningful. Otherwise it gives a wrong impression of fallout plumes covering US
-
I see the point re the dangers of atmospheric testing Mr Zerbo but accompanying data would be useful
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.