Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @Simplicator

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @Simplicator

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    16. ožu 2019.

    : More than meets the pie! Little did you know, but many of our most prominent politicians are actually super-powerful robots, hiding in our midst. This series profiles the Politiformers in the 2000s, the Republicons and the Demobots.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    "When choosing a candidate, consider what they'll do *after* the election. If the election is illegitimate, will they challenge it? If they clearly won, and Trump refuses to concede, will they fight? Or will they shrug and walk away?" --

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  4. 2. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    There wasn’t a data entry checkbox for “spine,” would’ve saved me a lot of ctrl-v

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    3. Put 1 & 2 together & you get my prediction: starting pretty soon, conservatives are going to start accusing Dems of cheating & election fraud. They might find some half- or quasi-truth to hang it on, but that's not necessary. The bubble can just invent stuff these days.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Many have asked if the House managers can move for a mistrial. Here are my quick thoughts: I wish Schiff WOULD make a motion for a mistrial based on, among other things, the revelation of Cipollone’s grossly unethical conduct/conflicts of interest. I wouldn’t be deterred that...

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The GOP line that they want to leave the decision on Trump to the people is a lie. They are hiding the facts from the people, participating in a cover up. They don't want people to know the truth. In doing so, they're taking away the people's ability to make an informed decision.

    Poništi
  8. 1. velj

    Now consider the same experiment with two plates, one for a billionaire and one for the median American. The billionaire would have everything except for a slice thin enough to see through, literally the thickness of a human hair at the crust end

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I don't think it's a coincidence that the Democrats got killed in both midterms of the Obama administration and wound up losing the White House to Donald Trump with a message that you should take your passion, quiet it down and save it for election day.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Another thought about SF corruption--I've been thinking this week that the corruption that exists in SF is the consequence and not the cause of a generally dysfunctional government. [thread]

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    I think what Libertarians can’t stand about poor people controlling their own affairs is that it clearly demonstrates that freedom for people who don’t have means (or whiteness or maleness) is only possible through the exercises of collective democratic authority. 5/5

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    This is about as explicit a rejection of democracy as you can get.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    The most dangerous talking point right now is the one saying that all we have to do is vote in November.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Now Perez is doing what he was put there to do, stop the left from breaking corporate fat cats’ grip on control of the party. Like Jeffies did to Barbara Lee, even like Ed Lee did in SF when Newsom left

    Poništi
  15. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    (OK I’ll stop now)

    Poništi
  16. 1. velj
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Hindsight is...

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    “The fact that [Bernie] obtained power outside of the confines of the party machine enrages those who sacrificed their own idealism to play the game.”

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj

    Note: McConnell could have moved to table Schumer’s amendments at the beginning on the first day of the trial. He didn’t. Now he is tabling Schumer’s amendments. What changed? Schumer is ok with him tabling the amendment now. It is all pre-scripted.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    PS/ The first impeachment made Trump the third POTUS in America's 244-year history to be impeached, and saw a majority of Americans support removal and a bipartisan vote for a full trial; the second impeachment would put Trump atop America's ignominous impeachment pyramid forever

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    This tweet concedes that by declaring it not in order to consider such motions, the Senate will have nuked its rules.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    This is what’s called for in this moment. If Democrats return to “business as unusual” after the GOP Senate has instigated a constitutional crisis, it legitimizes what happened. What’s to stop them then from simply ignoring the results of the upcoming election?

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·