But they are both being petty. They are both in the wrong.
-
-
Replying to @SimpleFlips @LyricWulf
I think you're letting your bias toward the different systems cloud your judgment. Someone was sexually used by someone who's lying to multiple people and cheated on their wife. While morals are opinionated, if this happened to you, you may have a difference stance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @naturalizze @LyricWulf
I'm actually being completely objective and not taking into consideration the personal stuff at all. One thing is blatantly lying to Paypal to ruse them into siding in your favor. The other is someone holding exclusive rights to their copyright and excercizing their rights.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
I'm not arguing what is fair and what is unfair between the two. My non objective opinion is they're both being complete shitheads. My objective opinion is one is abuse of the system and the other one isn't.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @SimpleFlips @LyricWulf
If you're looking at it from an objective point of view, then you'd understand that lyric wasn't lying about intending to donate 8.00 and I stead donated 800. It was within his realm to pull the 800 and he wasn't lying when he told PayPal it was a mistake. That's not abuse.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @naturalizze @LyricWulf
I've been streaming for 7 years. I don't buy that is what truthfully happened. He also stated he was aware with it and was fine with it until he wasn't. That's still a lie when reporting to Paypal what the issue was, and it's still abuse.
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
To be fair Thor was fine with them making the video until they weren’t.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I think they are definitely both in the wrong. Don't really see the relevance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I’m just thinking they’re both abusing a system. Allowing them to make the video and when they get mad they take it down and give them a strike
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yeah I don't believe in the two wrongs make a right thought train. But one thing did happen before the other, and revoking copyright isn't abuse of system in the same way chargeback fraud is. IP owners are always allowed to revoke copyright unless contracted.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
It'd actually make an interesting small claims case on whether or not him having said he can make a video is something that would be substantiated. I genuinely don't know but it isn't the point anyway. I'm not saying what Thor did was right, it wasn't. They're both in the wrong
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Wave Racer.
Business: s1mpled3@gmail.com