Your missing the point. The system is broken and it needs to change. If this happened with TV it would be a much bigger deal. TV has clear contracts so maybe that's the answer? A tiered partnership? Idk I'm not a content creator, just rational thinking person.
-
-
Replying to @FaerieJoker @JenLuvsReviews and
TV is different. Advertisers on TV pay top dollar to target specific content, content that has to abide by very specific guidelines. YT not only has much more freedom on what can be put on it but it works on a system where advertisers buy mass impressions that target the viewer..
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SimonWakefield @FaerieJoker and
Not the content. If an advertiser is happy to be associated with a creator no matter the subject matter they can and do approach that channel outside of YT's system and then it’s more like the TV system
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SimonWakefield @JenLuvsReviews and
Whether you think it's real or fake, good or bad, Phil's show is a news show. If an advertiser pulled their funding during a show for that show it wouldn't fly. It's not the exact same, its similar.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FaerieJoker @SimonWakefield and
You're still missing the point. YT has a partnership program. They bait content creators with adrevinue then pull it after YT gets the content. That's a con game. The full situation is more complex but for content creators it amounts to the same thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FaerieJoker @JenLuvsReviews and
The partnership program doesn’t grant you the right to have advertisers pay you for content that makes them look bad. I run a number of websites & have done for 20 years and they have been accepted into Adsense & other ad networks but that doesn’t mean I’m entitled to have ads..
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SimonWakefield @FaerieJoker and
Problem OR you have to appeal and hope they agree with your grounds of appeal OR just accept that you can’t have ads. The Advertisers are the ones who fund the content so keeping them happy is the most important factor
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SimonWakefield @JenLuvsReviews and
You're still not getting it. We're not asking for entitlement or rules to not be enforced. We're talking about fixing a broken system. Even if YT is fully legally right, being callus towards their content creators is bad for business.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FaerieJoker @JenLuvsReviews and
To make any content they wish and not have to delay their videos while the content is checked. You either tailor content to be fully family safe or if you want to make content that is on certain subjects you have to find advertisers directly. You can’t have both
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SimonWakefield @JenLuvsReviews and
I'm asking for change. Something fair for all parties. I'm not a lawyer, PR expert, advertiser or content creator. I don't have a concrete answer. I just see that the system we have now is unbalanced and should be corrected. I do have some ideas if you're interested.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If there was a viable change YT would have made it. YT lose out more than the creators do by not being able to serve ads on all videos.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.