A thread: why arithmetic numeracy is heavily under-appreciated and why it should not. "China camped millions of Uyghurs in XJ!" OK, let's play a bit of math game. How much room is needed to house, say, one million people? 20 sqm. Let's say it has four double bunkers, able to
-
-
infected, in the next week, he can only infect two people. And let's say Harvard's observation is accurate: Wuhan's outbreak started in Aug, instead of Dec. That means after five months (20 weeks) of outbreak, Wuhan should have 2^20 = 1mil infected cases. Still, this number is
Show this thread -
much lower than what we saw from the US three months into the outbreak. In any case, such an inevitable scenario escaping public attention *until* Harvard comes up with this new paper appears to be.. not credible.
Show this thread -
4) Wapo alleged that Wuhan's COVID 19 death toll should be 40k instead of 4k. We know that the CFR (case fatality rate) ranges from 1-5%. With 1%: Wuhan had 4mil infected cases. With 5%: Wuhan had 800k infected cases. Wuhan had around 9mil people before lockdown. Therefore its
Show this thread -
infection rate should be between 9%~45%. In Spain in the large sample study, infection rate was found to be 5% (large sample).
Show this thread -
AND we can use NYC as benchmark: both have similar population size, and NYC has been under much looser lockdown. NYC right now has 200k cases. How can we square this with "Wuhan has 800k ~ 4mil cases"?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.