I will not be accepting AC roles going forward. They are a waste of my time. They are a waste of the field's time. In fact, conferences proceedings should be drop kicked in favor of some new system. Typical review quality is so poor, we are now a cargo cult.
-
-
Odgovor korisniku/ci @roydanroy
I submitted to NeurIPS last year and was invited to review. No previous research experience. After investing ~8 hours per paper, I received 2 horrible quality reviews and 1 ok. None were constructive. Always wondered if this was an outlier or the norm.
1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa -
Odgovor korisniku/ci @_dsevero
And now, don't you feel properly incentivized?! (Of course, not!) When you have labs churning out 40 papers per conference, you know that there's no way reviewing is going to keep functioning as it has in the past.
0 proslijeđenih tweetova 25 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/restrict-researchers-one-paper-ayear-says-ucl-professor …
May be the suggestion of 1 paper / yr / researcher is too strict, but there needs to be some calling out of whether writing equivalent to a paper a week is really honest science.
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.