Why do federal judges jail >75% of people before trial? A groundbreaking new report by me and my Federal Criminal Justice Clinic, featured in USA Today, explains why: http://freedomdenied.law.uchicago.edu [1/6]
Despite his huge bond, SBF was set free when most people are jailed. Prosecutors must stop asking for financial conditions of release that people can’t afford, and federal judges must stop illegally jailing people when they can’t pay. [8/8]
The right question isn’t, should SBF go free? Rather we should ask why 118,000 human beings—most of whom are poor people of color—are currently locked in jail pre-trial in the federal system. [7/8]
Prosecutors bear the blame for these inequities, too. Federal prosecutors ask judges to lock 74% of people in jail pre-trial—they request jailing in 3 out of 4 cases. Yet prosecutors begged the judge to release SBF, accused of “stealing billions of dollars.” [6/8]
We also found that judges disproportionately jail people of color for poverty. 95% of the time when federal judges imposed a secured bond, the arrestee was a person of color. Unlike SBF, many were not released. [5/8]
Jailing people simply because they can’t make bail violates federal law. My Clinic’s Freedom Denied report found that federal judges jail people who are too poor to pay for their freedom in a staggering 36% of cases with $ conditions. Report here: https://freedomdenied.law.uchicago.edu. [4/8]
SBF’s release on a $250 million bond underscores the deep inequities of a federal pretrial jailing system that hits poor people and people of color the hardest. 90% of federal arrestees can’t afford a lawyer, let alone pay their way out of jail. [3/8]
As I said in the article, “If we’re comfortable releasing somebody accused of a crime of this magnitude, that should really make us question why we’re locking so many people in jail pending trial who are accused of far less serious crimes.” [2/8]
report found that judges were routinely unlawfully jailing poor people and imposing excessive financial conditions, with people of color significantly more likely to be jailed unlawfully
SBF got out of jail on a $250 million bond using his parents' house. But it's a faculty home on-campus. They rent the land from Stanford.
This isn't how it works for federal defendants who are not white and wealthy
75% are detained awaiting trial
SBF is out of jail on a $250 million bail bond, which prosecutors called the biggest ever. His parents had to pledge their $3.5 million house to secure it. But they aren’t homeowners in the usual sense, reports
For Valena Beety, AB ’02, JD ’06, Profs Geoffrey Stone and Herschella Conyers “were amazing mentors and role models for me when I was in Law School, and they still are today.” Read the profile: https://buff.ly/3XpqxIM
Our Freedom Denied Report is being highlighted in a series of posts on @VolokhC! In a five-part series, @UChicagolaw Federal Criminal Justice Clinic student @LessnickJaden and I summarize the federal jailing crisis and how to fix it. (Report here: https://freedomdenied.law.uchicago.edu)
Our Freedom Denied Report is being highlighted in a series of posts on @VolokhC! In a five-part series, @UChicagolaw Federal Criminal Justice Clinic student @LessnickJaden and I summarize the federal jailing crisis and how to fix it. (Report here: https://freedomdenied.law.uchicago.edu)
Stay tuned for the final two parts of our series, set to be released over the next few days! You can also read our full report here: http://freedomdenied.law.uchicago.edu
In Part 3, we describe how federal judges regularly lock poor people in jail without lawyers at their Initial Appearance hearing, despite federal law requiring the provision of counsel—a nationwide access-to-counsel crisis. Read Part 3 here:
In Part 2, we detail how judges fail to follow the legal standard at Initial Appearance hearings. As a result, judges routinely jail people unlawfully, and do so disproportionately in cases involving people of color. Read Part 2 here:
In Part 1, we describe how the federal system jails 75% of those awaiting trial, the result of a deeply ingrained ‘culture of detention’ that often contravenes federal law. Read Part 1 here:
“We conducted this study to understand why the federal system jails 75% of those pending trial ... We discovered that federal judges routinely lock people in jail in violation of the law,” write Prof.
Federal prosecutors: Please start agreeing to compassionate release motions. Your continued obstruction of CR thwarts Congress intent for it to be more widely used. So many people sitting in fed prison who can be released safely, including several of our clinic's clients.
This is an extremely important report to read. The failure of judges to take seriously their most basic obligation to protect the rights of poor people is an enormous stain on the profession, on the legal system, and on our society.
Why do federal judges jail >75% of people before trial? A groundbreaking new report by me and my Federal Criminal Justice Clinic, featured in USA Today, explains why: http://freedomdenied.law.uchicago.edu [1/6]
and the work of her legal clinic to bring light to this horrible, unjust practice that tries to obliterate the foundational principle of presumed innocence.
Why do federal judges jail >75% of people before trial? A groundbreaking new report by me and my Federal Criminal Justice Clinic, featured in USA Today, explains why: http://freedomdenied.law.uchicago.edu [1/6]
A 1984 law that changed the federal bail system to address crime committed by people released pending trial has been "wildly misunderstood and misapplied," writes
Our report highlights several ways judges can fix the federal jailing crisis. View our recommendations here: http://freedomdenied.law.uchicago.edu [5/5]
Data show that it isn’t necessary to jail so many people before trial because 99% of people released are not rearrested. Meanwhile, families and communities suffer dire consequences. [4/5]
Judges illegally jailed 12% of the people who were detained at their Initial Appearance. These illegal detentions fell on people of color at twice the rate of white arrestees. [3/5]
Judges routinely jail people simply because prosecutors ask them to, without requiring any legal justification. When prosecutors asked judges to jail someone at the Initial Appearance hearing, judges complied >99% of the time. [2/5]
A final striking finding from our Freedom Denied Report: widespread violations of the bail law by federal judges, often at the behest of prosecutors. http://freedomdenied.law.uchicago.edu [1/5]