Opens profile photo
Follow
Click to Follow SieglerAlison
Alison Siegler
@SieglerAlison
Prof and Founding Director of the Federal Criminal Justice Clinic . Views my own. “Mercy & empathy are great threats to an unjust society” -G. Doyle
Joined January 2020

Alison Siegler’s Tweets

Despite his huge bond, SBF was set free when most people are jailed. Prosecutors must stop asking for financial conditions of release that people can’t afford, and federal judges must stop illegally jailing people when they can’t pay. [8/8]
5
Show this thread
The right question isn’t, should SBF go free? Rather we should ask why 118,000 human beings—most of whom are poor people of color—are currently locked in jail pre-trial in the federal system. [7/8]
1
6
Show this thread
Prosecutors bear the blame for these inequities, too. Federal prosecutors ask judges to lock 74% of people in jail pre-trial—they request jailing in 3 out of 4 cases. Yet prosecutors begged the judge to release SBF, accused of “stealing billions of dollars.” [6/8]
Image
1
5
Show this thread
We also found that judges disproportionately jail people of color for poverty. 95% of the time when federal judges imposed a secured bond, the arrestee was a person of color. Unlike SBF, many were not released. [5/8]
Image
1
8
Show this thread
SBF’s release on a $250 million bond underscores the deep inequities of a federal pretrial jailing system that hits poor people and people of color the hardest. 90% of federal arrestees can’t afford a lawyer, let alone pay their way out of jail. [3/8]
1
9
Show this thread
As I said in the article, “If we’re comfortable releasing somebody accused of a crime of this magnitude, that should really make us question why we’re locking so many people in jail pending trial who are accused of far less serious crimes.” [2/8]
1
9
Show this thread
SBF got out of jail on a $250 million bond using his parents' house. But it's a faculty home on-campus. They rent the land from Stanford. This isn't how it works for federal defendants who are not white and wealthy 75% are detained awaiting trial
10
100
Show this thread
Excited to announce that Part 4 of our series about the federal jailing crisis is up! Check it out for our study’s findings about a major source of racially disparate jailing in federal drug cases: reason.com/volokh/2023/01
Quote Tweet
Our Freedom Denied Report is being highlighted in a series of posts on @VolokhC! In a five-part series, @UChicagolaw Federal Criminal Justice Clinic student @LessnickJaden and I summarize the federal jailing crisis and how to fix it. (Report here: freedomdenied.law.uchicago.edu)
Show this thread
6
In Part 3, we describe how federal judges regularly lock poor people in jail without lawyers at their Initial Appearance hearing, despite federal law requiring the provision of counsel—a nationwide access-to-counsel crisis. Read Part 3 here:
1
7
Show this thread
“We conducted this study to understand why the federal system jails 75% of those pending trial ... We discovered that federal judges routinely lock people in jail in violation of the law,” write Prof. and Jaden Lessnick, ’23.
6
Federal prosecutors: Please start agreeing to compassionate release motions. Your continued obstruction of CR thwarts Congress intent for it to be more widely used. So many people sitting in fed prison who can be released safely, including several of our clinic's clients.
Quote Tweet
The federal prison population is continuing its growth under the Biden administration, undoing seven prior years of downsizing.
Show this thread
Image
15
This is an extremely important report to read. The failure of judges to take seriously their most basic obligation to protect the rights of poor people is an enormous stain on the profession, on the legal system, and on our society.
Quote Tweet
Why do federal judges jail >75% of people before trial? A groundbreaking new report by me and my Federal Criminal Justice Clinic, featured in USA Today, explains why: freedomdenied.law.uchicago.edu [1/6]
Show this thread
1
309
So proud of my friend and the work of her legal clinic to bring light to this horrible, unjust practice that tries to obliterate the foundational principle of presumed innocence.
Quote Tweet
Why do federal judges jail >75% of people before trial? A groundbreaking new report by me and my Federal Criminal Justice Clinic, featured in USA Today, explains why: freedomdenied.law.uchicago.edu [1/6]
Show this thread
4
Judges routinely jail people simply because prosecutors ask them to, without requiring any legal justification. When prosecutors asked judges to jail someone at the Initial Appearance hearing, judges complied >99% of the time. [2/5]
2
75
Show this thread