Weird piece by @PaulChaloner re:Overwatch. Misinformed about hero picking options & map balance, only discusses cost https://splyce.gg/topics/post/256
-
-
-
Replying to @PaulChaloner
@PaulChaloner@SideshowGaming@SplyceGG sideshow I think the point of the article was to say the game has a lot of open uncertainties1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flameirl
@mattr0d@PaulChaloner Sure, but I'd prefer to hear Redeye's opinion on how they'll affect OW as he has tons of knowledge and experience.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SideshowGaming
@SideshowGaming@PaulChaloner on the topic of 'options' redeye has hosted a TI, comparing lobby options to competitive formats is ridiculous2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flameirl
@mattr0d@PaulChaloner His point was that since the options aren't in the game, he assumed blizzard wouldn't want to pursue them. They are.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SideshowGaming
@SideshowGaming@PaulChaloner I'd argue what hes saying is right though. Them putting options in the game makes them seem less invested2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flameirl
@mattr0d@PaulChaloner That wasn't a point in the article, you're giving the interesting opinions. I would have liked to hear his too.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SideshowGaming
@SideshowGaming@PaulChaloner ya I know but you're asking a lot from a neutral article was more what I meant1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@mattr0d @PaulChaloner Fair enough, perhaps I am. I just thought it was fairly vague, I'd love to see a more in-depth one.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.