To clarify on solo duo queue: we want to create a system that is fair for both teams and individuals to play in while avoiding the downsides of creating two queues (longer queue times, asymmetrical queue health). We are continuing to working towards that.
-
ESEA has been running in CS for over a decade before facilitating that same ecosystem for FaceIt. CS is rather unique in it's execution of an established third party ecosystem AND a rather trash first party official matchmaking system
I don't agree with point 3 that ranked "should" be the best for all. It has to cater to millions of players needs, whereas a 3rd party MM can specifically tailor its product to the people who care the most. Far easier to get change, no worries about compromise. Better for all.
-
-
And point 1 and 2 are potential Riot fuckups which they can avoid easily without hurting themselves. Easy lift, positive gain. There's an obvious downside to soloQ as stated above. No major downside to allowing 3rd party MM.
-
you would think so for your last point, but we've seen time and time again that publishers most notably Riot and Blizzard love to exert complete control over the entire ecosystem
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
there is something to be said for League and Dota's matchmaking system where getting to Challenger or 10k MMR REALLY means something while also catering to those millions of players both competitively and casual
-
League rating system is a bit of a trashy grind but yeah, at least it gives you all opportunities to perform on your own, and fail on your own.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.