BuT gReAt TeAmS mAkE qUiCk TrAnSitIoNs 


-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Outlaws above London btw
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To be fair - what else can you judge it on? How "strong" a team looks in a given match can depend on the strength of their opponent, and win%/match record is hard to use for comparison when OWL teams are only playing 7 games a stage.
-
Not trying to say it's a *good* metric. But the current format for OWL makes it really hard to judge how strong teams are imo.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Rock is better than scissors and scissors is better than paper so rock is better than paper. It's just math.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Correct me if I'm wrong but by that logic you can't compare anything due to how the league schedule is set up.
-
Correct, real time is not instantaneous. That’s EXACTLY why playoffs exist. The season is meant to float the best to the playoffs, and THEN we get the real data of who is directly best, at a specific moment.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
With a large enough sample size it'd be ignorant to avoid it. Like if two teams are close together in the standings and one does well against good teams and the other doesn't you can assume one is probably better.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
saw someone saying valiant was better than gladiators because gladiators got beat by boston who got beat by justice who got beat by valiant lmao
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Valiant beat Reign, Reign beat NYXL, Valiant > NYXL
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.