@SiddhiGal @vajramrita nonduality of subject and object means no difference between the experiencer and the experience?
-
-
Replying to @SiddhiGal
@SiddhiGal @vajramrita I prefer your explanation to Benzin's, it addresses the problem of objects without asserting an external reality2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anyane
@anyane don't think Benzin asserts an external reality. Mind, consciousness & language are phenomena which occur within reality.@SiddhiGal2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LapisAlienus
@vajramrita
@SiddhiGal but again, I biased towards a Yogachara perspective1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @anyane
@anyane Berzin is talking here within "The Gelug/Kagyü Tradition of Mahamudra" ...@SiddhiGal1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LapisAlienus
@vajramrita
@anyane Maybe it's me, but this table-anger analogy seems overly 'synthetic'. Or it's done on purpose to emphasise non-sameness1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SiddhiGal
@SiddhiGal I think the emphasis is on interdependence - no object without subject (and vice-versa), no internal without external.@anyane1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @LapisAlienus
@vajramrita Absolutely. But I also believe interconnectedness isn't to be mistaken 4 sameness or identification, from nondual view
@anyane1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SiddhiGal
@SiddhiGal I see interconnectedness and emptiness as two sides of the same coin.@anyane1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
@vajramrita That's true. @anyane
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.