Lopon told the class that sem was mistranslated as mind, when it should be heart or heart-mind.
-
-
Replying to @LapisAlienus
@vajramrita this teacher was Tibetan and Buddhist, so not sure Abrahamic religious views would apply...but what do you mean exactly?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LapisAlienus
@anyane I love this definition of "sems" from this link http://www.berzinarchives.com/web/en/archives/e-books/published_books/gelug_kagyu_mahamudra/pt1/mm_04.html …pic.twitter.com/Z7E8ZCxTYf
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @LapisAlienus
@vajramrita an interesting view of the nonduality of subject and object, I'm used to it being discussed from the perspective of Yogachara
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SiddhiGal
@SiddhiGal @vajramrita nonduality of subject and object means no difference between the experiencer and the experience?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@anyane I see nonduality as simply seeing the fact as it is, and not the idea/narrative of the fact @vajramrita
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.