No scientific evidence could be provided to prove that time exists.
-
-
Replying to @SiddhiGal
@SiddhiGal Time may just be a perspective of relative position; the time-space continuum. How do you have time if you never take time?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @coalitionviral
@coalitionviral Nobody has seen time. It's a mere convention to frame impermanent, changing cycles as time..2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SiddhiGal
@coalitionviral Sun rises and sets repeatedly, where is this linear notion of time (?)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SiddhiGal
@SiddhiGal Birth. Life. Death. To one individual that seems quite linear. Perception of never being able to go back in time.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @coalitionviral
@coalitionviral Impermanence is what strikes as linear, indeed. Impermanence is real. Time is still abstraction.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SiddhiGal
@SiddhiGal Math is also an abstraction but it helps one to be able to count their chickens before they're hatched.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@coalitionviral Oh, I wasn't denying practical dimension of convention of time. My curiosity is, say, merely ontological.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.