A) If vaccines were safe & effective how would a debate change that? B) A debate is won by the most skilled debater, not the one who is necessarily right. C) Science isn't decided or changed by a debate. That's what peer-reviewed studies are for
-
-
-
D) A debate is for those who seek publicity. E) I won a debate in high school proving the earth was flat. F) Is OJ innocent or did his lawyers just win the debate? G) Only a losing side would request a debate H) Why would a non-expert debate an expert? I) Get some new lines!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If gravity is real why not have the debate?!?!?!?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I've offered to debate in place of Dr. Pan. I've even offered Jr home field advantage. Aka anti-vax rules- Loudest Wins. Still haven't heard a sound out of him...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because that would mean giving you a platform and you don't deserve it. Don't waste Dr. Pan's time.
-






good one..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Because Science isn't decided by debate. Putting a real physician beside a vaccine denier lends the denier credibility they haven't earned and don't deserve. You wouldn't put a holocaust denier up to debate a holocaust survivor.
-
Why not?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
That's his body guard clearly.. because you crazy shills he needs one. I don't blame him one bit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would you also like to debate gravity?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.