Medijski sadržaj
- Tweetovi
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj, trenutna stranica.
-
#PlanB/Landing Tweet#PlanB / What Is Creative Commerce Disruption? https://twitter.com/Shoq/status/1052265997959221248 …#PlanB / Introduction https://twitter.com/Shoq/status/1160559748141518849 …#PlanB / Rationale https://twitter.com/Shoq/status/1200935152068759553 …pic.twitter.com/JXgxPx4OUr
Prikaži ovu nit -
Putin: How many ways can our FSB game the U.S. 2020 Election Aide: At last count, 842, give or take a ratfuck or two. Putin: Tampering with votes is expensive. What isn’t? Aide: Ensure the Democratic primary numbers aren’t delivered on time. Putin: Go make me proud.pic.twitter.com/myxLK0Oj8t
-
RealClear’s betting odds on who gets the nomination. Republicans are absolutely effervescent.pic.twitter.com/shUtWFD2rg
-
.
@tweetdeck@twittersupport. The new DM reaction-emojis in Tweetdeck don’t work as on other devices. We get a new message for each reaction applied. Totally annoying. Can we assume this#reactionbug is a known issue?#tweetdeckpic.twitter.com/c9D9ejSUMk
-
SORRY, I had to take this down. In this insane Twitterverse, the words “take down” would be reported as “wishing harm.” Far less has been. Why aren’t you
#FreeSpeech advocates like the@ACLU all over Twitter about this. What is it you all do again?pic.twitter.com/muiDN5Fcpx
-
When are you executives of our major newspapers going to debunk this “big lie,” that the Nazis were so well known for. Everyone knows the “transcripts” actually incriminate him, yet you empower this psychopath by letting him gaslight the nation with his “read the … 1/2pic.twitter.com/r7LOaB52CB
-
I really wish some psychologist would do a study on when people “like” vs retweet. I will never understand it. This is an example where it’s merely a minor form of rebuttal, so it’s less curious, but even so, it’s so lopsided. (I RTed it because it’s a corrective.)pic.twitter.com/Kf3twyNgrp
-
.
@mittromney I’ve always loathed you for your complicity with hideous conservative policies. And it was appalling to watch you so sheepishly resist Trumpism. But you stepped-up and did something genuinely courageous for your county. I commend and thank you for it.pic.twitter.com/UmfuHQRKsG
-
#Bloomberg’s Small Towns ad, with JC Melloncamp. It’s hardly a new approach, but it’s very nicely done.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uNLM8Hxas0&feature=youtu.be … -
This may astound. Our friend
@SandaBlue was PERMANENTLY suspended for this tweet. Yes, she used a bad word; one used on Twitter about a billion times a day. Typically, you’re locked out & just delete it. Not this time. No appeal. PLEASE REFOLLOW at@SandaBlueDeuxpic.twitter.com/qIW8XpXsqg
-
Uh, campaign accounts always lag far behind personal accounts, even for well known candidates. Better tell Sirota to try another angle. We know he scares you folks.pic.twitter.com/ULij0jyldo
-
.
@Foxnews will be on fire tonight.@SeanHannity will say he was always suspicious of@MittRomney’s unrelenting liberalism, and@tuckerCarlson will say that he just did it for the money.pic.twitter.com/5EJ3mRmysB
-
Rich people don’t scare me. Rich people with selfish agendas & no conscience do. And I am one of the few people who always thought
@ralphnader was correct; we are in a terrible place and it’s quite possible that “only the super rich can save us.” https://www.amazon.com/Only-Super-Rich-Can-Save-Us/dp/158322923X/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=only+the+super+rich&qid=1580931455&sr=8-1 … https://twitter.com/DrGianRico/status/1225140529240969217 …pic.twitter.com/IEfQvaLpp2
-
And of course, the other driver of this shift in interest toward
@Mike2020 was 50% Bernie’s weak Iowa win, 25^% seeing his ads, and 25%@ninaturner showing up on TV more often with fails like this.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4gB7JDUBlg … -
.
@occupytheport Very persuasive argument. I’ll have to get back to you after I’ve considered it carefully for a second or two.pic.twitter.com/vs6kcTnRji
-
What I think more effective than this impeachment? A 2nd impeachment. That drives home the duty to hold accountable argument like the 1st did not. And this time,
@speakerpelosi can demand a deal on witnesses before turning the articles over and everyone will know why.pic.twitter.com/OmOCI3tbip
-
Take the
#womensmarch 3 yrs ago. What was achieve? A few more women got active, went to Congress and w/ Indivisible’s assist, helped flip it (which has happened many times. Yet liberals still speak of it with reverence, like some watershed of activism. I see such …pic.twitter.com/GWkFdPEZVn
Prikaži ovu nit -
.
@eleven_films has made another brilliant video artifact that makes me all the more annoyed that@tomperez@speakerpelosi and@adamschiff did not hire them, or someone like them, to produce daily roundups of each day of#impeachment.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5D3iT4BhbQ …
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.