If I could use an alias I'd do it , otherwise the confidentiality issue would be too high a risk. @She_RaRoberts @stevefc_cox @YouTube
-
-
It's a really simple process (cheek swab) and as far as I'm aware, your details & data aren't published anywhere.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Are details kept on servers where they could possibly be hacked?
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
That type of data would be pointless to hack. For published studies on human migration via DNA, no personal details are allowed at all
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @She_RaRoberts @stevefc_cox and
it would be a violation of ethics.
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
They wouldn't have any details in a database at any time?I'm interested in possibility not probability.
1 reply . 1 retweet 1 like -
Your Amazon or Netflix accounts are more likely to be hacked than a DNA bank. Have a look on Ancestry DNA: http://ancstry.me/2kO7yJc
1 reply . 0 retweets 1 like -
I found this, dont know if it's true.http://fusion.net/story/215204/law-enforcement-agencies-are-asking-ancestry-com-and-23andme-for-their-customers-dna/ …
2 replies . 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @stevefc_cox @AngieMeader
US works differently to UK including access to credit files etc. If you've been arrested they already have enough
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes -
biometric data on record, inc. cheek swabs etc. As it stands, as far as I'm aware, it would be a violation of
1 reply . 0 retweets 0 likes
civil liberties for gov body to access your genetics without relevant authorisation. Personally, I wouldn't have
-
any objections to using these services (though I would do thorough check on company first).
0 replies . 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this info to make your timeline better. Undo
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.