Hey @Elonmusk. Can you put my fears to rest that there is nothing dangerous about using 5G. Are we not saturating ourselves in more exposure to EMF radiation and at higher frequencies?
I love technology, but I don't like being a forced guinea pig.
-
-
Still non-ionizing. Anything with that much power will create heat. Even that article says no increased cancer risk was found. 5G is like being sprayed by a mister, that’s like being hit with a fire hose. It’s still just water, but it might hurt a bit with that much force.
-
Actually it burned their skin in 5 seconds. So my question is...What do many towers with lower wattage, sending the same 95GHZ, over a way longer exposure period, do to everyone (including the environment) within the range or network of towers? Do we know for sure?
- Još 8 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
95 Ghz waves were chosen for ADS *because* they are safer than lower frequency waves. Difference between 5G & ADS is akin to 5.56mm caliber bullet at rest vs muzzle velocity. It isn't the weight of the bullet, it is the concentrated energy propelling it.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.