What fanciful notions Trump apologists worry about! Where is there a shred of evidence Trump is being “framed” by anyone? His business ties to Russian oligarchs & mobsters is established fact. Only question is whether he coordinated with Russia’s military on the election.
-
-
-
Did I miss the evidence of “framing?” Where has there been a single, even marginally credible report of any of the evidence being concocted by intelligence officials? Instead of sneering at me, point me to your evidence.
-
#1 (and this is from sources who are intel officials): using unverified political oppo research to obtain wiretap vs. Trump associate. Against the rules. Possibly criminal violation by intel officials. There's more but this is one of the biggest known.
-
Yes but we know that didn’t happen. Even Nunes admits the FISA warrants didn’t rely only on the dossier. The dossier might be wrong but it’s intent wasn’t to frame Trump. It’s opposition research, ie its only value to the Dems was if it was true.
-
(What didn't happen? What I wrote did happen.) Also, with respect, I don't have ESP into the minds of those who submitted the dossier and am surprised you think you do! I do have some good intel sources, however, who are assisting me with context.
-
Here's the simple flow. DNC/Hillary pay for fake dossier. IC uses fake dossier to get FISA warrant and listen in on Trump campaign. Brennan and Clapper leak to CNN that they told Trump about fake dossier as if it is a real IC product. Framed.
-
There's no evidence at all for this: "IC uses fake dossier to get FISA warrant and listen in on Trump campaign." The FISA warrant was on Carter Page, who at the time was no longer on the Trump campaign. There was no "listening" -- unless you have some proof of that.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I agree Mueller will find out if Trump conspired w/Russia. What I want 2 know: If Mueller finds out it's NOT true, n I think Muller already knows the answer, at what point will he announce the truth AND stop wasting tax payer money n tell us what he is looking into now? Thoughts?
-
If he finds out it's NOT true, we have to have confidence he'd follow a trail that could lead to himself and people he knows .. I wonder...
-
Funny...look at the New York Times front page today...I think your answer has come!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"...framed by the intel community" is pretty cute. It must be exhausting being a Trump apologist.
-
So true, that's exactly what I am, and it is tiring indeed! You are very intelligent.pic.twitter.com/CB7ORM8XkQ
-
Sharyl is one of the few who will call out both sides when they deserve it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Sharyl, you are a long time Republican apologist. Please don’t comment on insiders. Didn’t you formerly call yourself a journalist?
-
I can comment on anything I want, but thanks for trying to censor there! And you have me pegged as the Republican apologist but please don't tell anybody else!pic.twitter.com/T3HBpAwkUd
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes he can.
-
You may be right
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
On the first possibility, one would think that Mueller would have found evidence of collusion by now if it were there to be found. On the second I tend to agree. Trump is a threat to the livelihood of the political class that will do anything to preserve the system.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.