I’m glad you allowed for the possibility you didn’t have it right. You don’t. Said authorizations were approved well prior to the “research” to which you refer.
-
-
-
That's incorrect. The Carter Page wiretap was turned down until the first application containing the unverified "dossier" information.
-
But others were approved prior, and your assertion was broad. The fact that so many Trump campaign officials have legally-approved surveillance that it is hard for most people to keep track is hardly a point in favor of your core argument.
-
We could write a book on the details; nobody's trying to do that here. What I wrote was accurate. And the fact that so many Trump campaign officials were surveilled could mean 1. they are suspicious people or could mean 2. intel community abusing authority for political reasons.
-
I disagree with your assessment of accuracy. It could mean many things, sure. It could mean, for instance, that they committed crimes. Implying abuse (sans evidence) is reckless. It’s also by design: get us to doubt the fairness of the process.
-
Yes it could mean they committed crimes. It could mean that intel community abused authority. There's lot of evidence of intel surveillance abuse in recent years incl the spying done on me. But you can differ of course! And if they didn't do it to you, it's easier to dismiss.
-
it could also mean Hydra took over the FBI and is trying to kill Trump who is secretly Captain America. but it doesn't, because like your claims that notion is absurd.
-
If you say so, cartoon man.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
How dense can you be?
-
(Or you could offer a constructive counterpoint... )pic.twitter.com/x4yYwlWC5V
-
Your tweet is full of lies and misconstructions. I don't know if you are confused or dishonest. Or both.
-
Can you be more specific? Govt officials used unverified political oppo research from Russia vs Trump (TRUE) to wiretap US citizen(s) (TRUE)--investigatg
@DonaldJTrumpJr (TRUE) 4 meeting w/Russians (TRUE) to possibly obtain political oppo research (TRUE) he never received. (TRUE) -
The intel from Australia corroborated elements of the dossier, so no, NOT TRUE. Also many (but not all) elements of the dossier have since been corroborated.
-
Like you I will also wasn’t aware of the FBI rules in presenting evidence for the FISA court and didn’t realize they had violated them, Perhaps committing a crime. Thanks to my inside sources For pointing me to the rules.
-
Wow aren’t you priceless?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You’re not a very good investigative journalist.
-
Darn. Remind me to turn in my membership card.pic.twitter.com/CifZ9FfHtp
-
Stick to your guns and don't feed the trolls. Unless you don't have anyting more important to do. Everything will come out. The whole sordid mess. Most importantly we must learn the right operation instructions for the Republic.
-
I enjoy the engagement between working !
-
I sometimes digress into the rabbit hole myself ... lol
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.