I could be wrong but I sense that more people who have felt bullied into not saying they support @realDonaldTrump are going to start coming forward and reminding us this is still America. 1/2 @kanyewest
-
-
Considering voting is anonymous & 54% of the USA didn’t vote for him in ‘16, it seems clear this tweet is you projecting than you dispassionately ruminating. And since Trump’s current 41% approval shows he hasn’t made any progress since Election Day, you’re frankly unconvincing.
24 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @ehlnewsfeed @SharylAttkisson and
EHL is not too good with facts. Despite irrelevance of popular vote, 47.3% of 121M voters went Trump 47.8% went Clinton. Your 54% is fake news. Trump's current approval is over 50%, has been on steady increase, and is higher than BHO at same point in his disastrous term.pic.twitter.com/zrHZyZRrYz
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Inquisitor1124 @SharylAttkisson and
Huh? Your own screenshot should illuminate why you're confused; the votes were not all counted by Nov. 14th, bud. Trump's current approval is a dismal sub-41%, worst in modern presidential history:pic.twitter.com/xb0t5X5XYy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ehlnewsfeed @SharylAttkisson and
48.2% =/= 54% 65M =/= 54% x 323M Also, OOPS on approval rating. Pic relevant...and this despite relentless Obama worship and Trump bashing. Reality is hard for you, isn't it.pic.twitter.com/hok5e7VEAl
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Inquisitor1124 @SharylAttkisson and
You're slow; 54% of the country didn't vote for him, that's still fact. Read it carefully. (By the way, love how you can't bring yourself to admit your screenshot was bunk). Also, Rasmussen is just one poll, smart people aggregate all polls, and they don't look good: 8% behind.pic.twitter.com/a5a0mycggR
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ehlnewsfeed @SharylAttkisson and
No, you're slow. 65M is 20% of US. That means 80% did not vote for Trump and 80% did not vote for Hillary. As for polls, smart people look at polls that have been historically more accurate. The same aggregators with Trump @ 40% now also predicted he'd lose @ 98%. Try again?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Inquisitor1124 @ehlnewsfeed and
What you likely meant is 54% of those who voted didn't vote for Trump. Fallacious argument because 52% of those who voted didn't vote for Clinton. One can unironically say that the MAJORITY didn't vote for either candidate. But IRRELEVANT because Electoral College, bitches.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Inquisitor1124 @SharylAttkisson and
Yes that's right, Clinton was a terrible candidate and not likable. Almost as bad as Trump.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But some people loved Clinton just as some love Trump. I'm just saying there should be room I think for opposing opinions without hating the other person.pic.twitter.com/bBAr5psL69
-
-
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Inquisitor1124 and
Yes, while qualified, Clinton was still a universally distrusted candidate (for good reason) yet many people still loved her. I get it but don't agree with it. Pure hatred isn't ever good, agreed.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ehlnewsfeed @SharylAttkisson and
And for the record, I voted. But not for either of those two.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Inquisitor1124 @SharylAttkisson and
Indeed and I don’t blame you at all.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.