Article after article discrediting Mueller, discrediting the FBI but never a word about the egregious corruption in the Trump admin? Not one story on Pruitt? Not one on the huge loans given to Kushner after meeting in WH? Nothing on $31K tables? Nope, all FBI all the time.
-
-
-
Uh well that's kind of how some articles work. They don't address every topic. They focus on one or two. And this is one that deserves a lot of attention in my opinion, based in part on my friends and sources in intel. So I'm going with that.
-
Uh huh. Erynselective you are in your stories. They always seem to go one way. Funny how that works. Are you angling for Laura Ingrahams job? Diversify a bit. Let’s see if you can find ONE thing to criticize about Trump or Republican Congress.
-
It would earn you some credibility as that independed journalist you claim to be or does Sinclair not allow that? Would you jeopardize your job if you were critical of the Trump administration? Do they have you on a short leash?
-
I'm not concerned about "earning credibility" among anybody who doesn't think I have any. I don't operate for effect. I could not care less... that's probably why my stories are often off the popular narratives (as I intend them to be).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
On Mueller, have you seen
@replouiegohmert article?https://twitter.com/replouiegohmert/status/989223733113114625?s=21 …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Given the SC’s documented, lengthy history, of showing willful distain for ethics and morality in law, positing that he is *...likely...,* to be more honest than his friends and colleagues, is beyond fanciful wishing. Mr. Robert Mueller is no*Boy Scout,*as apologists portray him
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If he can't be he's as rare as a termite on the Parthenon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I stand corrected. Journalism isn't dead...yet. There are some that can still write thought-provoking pieces without descending into mud-slinging partisanship. Please write more, Sharyl. I like being able to discern points worth pondering without having to wade through sewage.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is significant evidence that he is dishonest . Reference to the Dem biased attorneys that He hired and the wild and harsh trajectory that the investigation has taken. He and his investigation look bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, because he is an Accomplice to a crime - the illegal sale of HEU.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It seems to me that if you associate with a certain kind of people you become that kind of person
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Typical for you, Sharyl. Outstanding opinion/analytical contribution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Should I feel bad that I have doubts about him now? mI'd love to ask him to look into your computer being hacked into...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He would have to be an extremely strong man and IMO, I don't see it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.