Since I wrote this article in 2008, the rate of autism -- according to the government -- has gotten much, much worse as our govt. and "best" experts are still mystified as to how to reverse this. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-open-question-on-vaccines-and-autism/ …https://twitter.com/dkegel/status/987853815687790592 …
-
-
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
Since back then, strong evidence has been found for prenatal causes, e.g. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29346770 implicates a number of mutations, and suggests a mechanism for how valproic acid causes ASD. It's an exciting time - we're actually learning a lot about the causes of autism!
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @dkegel
Yes all those genetic mutations in one generation. How exciting! (But whatever you do, don't look at those studies that suggest some links to vaccines, and particularly don't listen to the CDC scientist who says they have covered this up. He can't be telling the truth.)
1 reply 3 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
*shrug* Many studies have looked at whether vaccines are involved, and the answer seems to be 'no'; see https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24814559 . The evidence for prenatal causes, by comparison, is quite compelling (see above).
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dkegel
but those with genetic predispositions or other exposures or underlying risks do... And here's just a few of the scientists/peer reviewed studies who believe their research suggests a link. https://sharylattkisson.com/2016/11/27/what-the-news-isnt-saying-about-vaccine-autism-studies/ …
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
The 1st & 4th researchers on your list, Tomljenovic & Shaw, have had several papers retracted; see https://retractionwatch.com/?s=Tomljenovic & https://retractionwatch.com/?s=Christopher+Shaw … The 2nd & 3rd, DeSoto & Hitlan, appear to now focus on prenatal causes of autism. Note the trend?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dkegel
As you probably know, there's a push to discredit the scientists who investigate or even stumble upon vaccine side effects... yet no retractions, for example, re: the paper that CDC author admits involved literally trashing data and purposely downplaying vaccine-autism links..
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
No, I don't know that; sounds like an unsupported conspiracy theory, i.e. one that is not well supported by evidence. In any event, Ms. Attkisson, you would do well to pay more attention to the actual content of current science, and less to political analysis of science.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm not sure what you mean but I am basing my knowledge off current science, just not necessarily what is selectively pushed by some. I tend to give weight to those who have proven reliable in the past vs. interests who have proven less reliable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.