I have doubts about SPJ's true impartiality, much less ethics they pursue. The story was tagged with: "This post was updated on 12/19 to clarify that I believe the statements reported by Politico were incorrect – not that Politico incorrectly reported the statements." O... K.
-
-
-
Did Politico likewise amend its article? I don't see that they did.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
When did “based off” instead of “based on” become a thing?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Professional journalists" relying on "third party reports" and "assuming" they are accurate" is part of the problem - isn't it? :-)
-
Isn't that kinda like "ghostly" anonymous sources?



-
There was a time when being wrong, especially irresponsibly wrong, about too many things was a death knell and your reputation could be irreparably harmed. In today's world, your accuracy, your truthfulness, even your word, mean nothing given the right agenda or the right price.
-
Absolute truth. Extremely frightening but true. If we can't right this ship soon Democracy, western culture and the "Rule of Law" will be EXTINCT. Never to come again. Be careful what you wish for youngsters!
#DrainTheDeepStateSwamp -
As Benjamin Franklin is credited with saying, after being asked by a woman what kind of government we were getting at the end of the Convention, "A Republic, if you can keep it." (Source: Dr. James McHenry, Maryland delegate)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This doesn’t really change much, Sinclair is still a propoganda mill pushing out pro-Trump talking points. This is why we need the Fairness Doctrine returned to service.
-
Nice propaganda talking points. (But at some point, you get hit with reality.)pic.twitter.com/0LkKiw8yUE
-
Haha, but you know that’s not entirely true. The Fox types would be blowing up if Obama did 1/10 of the things trump has, yet they & the Fake Christians seem to back him no matter how crazy he gets. I suspect they’d back Nixon all the same, because truth isn’t in their vocabulary
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seriously so sick of "unnamed sources". If you can't name your source,then you shouldn't be reporting what they're saying
-
They can't name them because most of them are "made up" kinda like Hillary's "opposition research"? Who's kidding who, she paid Millions to have the dossier fabricated from the beginning.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
True journalism is all but dead.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Shouldn’t journalists instinctively know not to trust the work of other journalists?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The number of retweets of corrections, minuscule, compared to the original story. Same thing every time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
