Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
SharylAttkisson's profile
Sharyl Attkisson
Sharyl Attkisson
Sharyl Attkisson
Verified account
@SharylAttkisson

Tweets

Sharyl AttkissonVerified account

@SharylAttkisson

Investigative Journalist @FullMeasureNews *Note* RTs not=endorsement; RTs may be interesting, silly, wrong, outrageous. Question authority. Think for yourself.

Washington, DC
SharylAttkisson.com
Joined October 2010

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Apr 4

    Re: Trump interview w/special counsel, perhaps all can agree it should be under same terms @TheJusticeDept gave Hillary Clinton: 1. An exoneration letter is drafted in advance. 2. Immunity is given to top Trump aides (and they’re allowed to sit in on interview). (Continued)

    9:39 AM - 4 Apr 2018
    • 12,809 Retweets
    • 21,943 Likes
    • Larry Putnam ⭐⭐⭐ Kat Cat Trump loving swamp hater Max Liles Sr. Truth_Pill Kent Markus Leanus John Trudel Pastor_Bob_Celeste
    938 replies 12,809 retweets 21,943 likes
      1. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Apr 4

        3. Interview isn’t recorded. 4. Lead official (Mueller) doesn’t attend. 5. #2 official’s family has received large donations from Trump political friends. 6. Prior to the interview, lead official meets privately on plane tarmac with Trump's wife (to discuss grandchildren). (Cont)

        122 replies 4,083 retweets 7,595 likes
        Show this thread
        Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
        Undo
      1. New conversation
      2. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Apr 4

        7. Main interviewer has expressed disdain for Trump’s opponents, such as discussing an “insurance plan” with higher-ups to undermine them. If the same terms aren’t offered...Was Clinton’s interview process unfair? Or is the one proposed for Trump unfair? #FairIsFair

        33 replies 2,758 retweets 5,480 likes
        Show this thread
      3. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Apr 4

        8. As long as they believe Trump didn't intend any harm, he's let off the hook for any violations.

        75 replies 2,400 retweets 5,100 likes
        Show this thread
      4. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Apr 4

        9. If Trump becomes a target, it should be referred to as a "matter" not an investigation.

        34 replies 2,068 retweets 4,552 likes
        Show this thread
      5. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Apr 4

        10. Trump aides should be permitted to destroy subpoenaed or relevant public records and wipe relevant servers with a cloth or something.

        251 replies 2,307 retweets 5,027 likes
        Show this thread
      6. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. josh11987‏ @josh119872 Apr 4
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson @TheJusticeDept

        SHARYL. Do you relly need to ALLWAYS go back to HILLARY? Sounds like you're afraid Tump has something to hide! Wouldn't you want it ALL in the open?

        19 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
      3. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Apr 4
        Replying to @josh119872 @TheJusticeDept

        Can you show me the "always" back to Hillary evidence? I rarely talk about her. Second, this has nothing to do with what either of them may have had to hide. Don't you agree both should be treated the same, now matter who you support or are against? That's all.

        9 replies 46 retweets 288 likes
      4. josh11987‏ @josh119872 Apr 4
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson @TheJusticeDept

        The GOP brings up HILLARY all the time as a way to distract. As far as being fair goes. You probably know every case is different! Mueller is a REPUBLICAN chose by a REPUBLICAN so why wouldn't you trust his decision on how to investigate?

        33 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
      5. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Apr 4
        Replying to @josh119872 @TheJusticeDept

        Ok thanks for your correction, because I certainly don't "always" bring up Hillary. I didn't say I do or don't trust Mueller. I will say that since many (most?) Republicans oppose Trump, one cannot use partly alone to try to determine supposed fairness.

        0 replies 2 retweets 4 likes
      6. End of conversation
      1. New conversation
      2. dscott578‏ @dscott578 Apr 4
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson @TheJusticeDept

        Amazing what Hillary got away with

        9 replies 61 retweets 444 likes
      3. susiewallace‏ @susiewallace817 Apr 4
        Replying to @dscott578 @SharylAttkisson @TheJusticeDept

        It aint over for her yet!

        7 replies 17 retweets 201 likes
      4. Jack Burton‏ @Jack_Burton33 Apr 4
        Replying to @susiewallace817 @dscott578 and

        pic.twitter.com/n73MBUR8MZ

        39 replies 94 retweets 376 likes
      5. Jack Again‏ @JackAgainski Apr 4
        Replying to @Jack_Burton33 @susiewallace817 and

        "Why aren't I 50 years to life you might ask..."

        4 replies 14 retweets 145 likes
      6. 1 more reply
      1. New conversation
      2. IT Guy‏ @ITGuy1959 Apr 4
        Replying to @SharylAttkisson @TheJusticeDept

        This is great. I would add one more: The over-arching criteria for any criminal indictment resolves around whether there was clear "intent" to commit a malicious act. Whether any laws were actually broken is immaterial.

        16 replies 242 retweets 879 likes
      3. Paul Beyer‏ @PBizzel Apr 4
        Replying to @ITGuy1959 @SharylAttkisson @TheJusticeDept

        This brings up a question...Is "Intent" part of the statute for Obstruction? Not a lawyer, just curious. 👍

        18 replies 34 retweets 136 likes
      4. Scott Kaspar  🔹‏ @ScottKaspar Apr 4
        Replying to @PBizzel @ITGuy1959 and

        Intent is a required element. Funny thing is, intent was not a required proof of the charges against Hillary, but somehow her lack of intent kept her out of the pokey.

        15 replies 56 retweets 299 likes
      5. Paul Beyer‏ @PBizzel Apr 4
        Replying to @ScottKaspar @ITGuy1959 and

        Ok, so w/that said, how would one Prove in Court someone's "Intent to Obstruct" if there was NEVER a Collusion crime? 1. I understand there's no statute per say, but... 2. The Obstruction relates to a perjury trap on Flynn, as opposed to Collusion. Seems like a stretch.pic.twitter.com/3Ms5qYaLWP

        3 replies 5 retweets 27 likes
      6. Scott Taylor‏ @scottyp3366 Apr 4
        Replying to @PBizzel @ScottKaspar and

        COLLUSION IS NOT A CRIME! Why don’t you libtard idiots get this basic principle!

        2 replies 2 retweets 26 likes
      7. Paul Beyer‏ @PBizzel Apr 4
        Replying to @scottyp3366 @ScottKaspar and

        Slow your roll...I'm pretty sure there aren't any Libs on this thread. Actually, trying to figure out Mueller's angle based on what we know to be true (factual). Ps~I used the Cenk GIF to make fun of him, just in case that sent you off.

        3 replies 3 retweets 35 likes
      8. 1 more reply

    Loading seems to be taking a while.

    Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

      Promoted Tweet

      false

      • © 2018 Twitter
      • About
      • Help Center
      • Terms
      • Privacy policy
      • Cookies
      • Ads info