Should I question someone’s own veracity and credibility after checking out their page and two out of the three who to follow” are from Fox News?
-
-
Replying to @Elegant01300503 @SharylAttkisson and
And if I don’t agree with you its because “I only see what I want to.” Okay and I am sure that you see everything whether you want to or not? Quite a judgmental skill set you have. Nothing is purely objective - we all see through the lense of who we are.
6 replies 2 retweets 46 likes -
Uh, I didn't say that to you. You seem to be upsetting yourself. I certainly hope I didn't do that to you!
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Elegant01300503 and
Another one. Plant the seed and sit back to watch. What the hell does ‘ethically challenged’ even mean?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @agirlinBK @SharylAttkisson and
It means that she is a complete liar.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Love_TimHortons @SharylAttkisson and
Oh okay. Well, she’s not. Moving on.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @Love_TimHortons @SharylAttkisson and
I don’t get it...the Sinclair story bothered you or not? Because it can be an issue even if you don’t like Maggie Haberman for whatever reasons you’ve told yourself.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @agirlinBK @Love_TimHortons and
I don't get it--did you read the correction? Sinclair offered all sides the exact same opportunities to reach local audiences. Just as most every news organization did, which seems to be to be the responsible way to serve audiences. Politico's false story was and later corrected.
4 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Love_TimHortons and
I did not and I will. Apologies if I was behind in the thread. I was reacting more to Maggie Haberman attack, which seemed like an unfair deflection.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.