As you watch the simulcasts of Sinclair on-air staff reading scripts about the dangers that some reporters present to democracy, recall this:https://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/trump-campaign-sinclair-broadcasting-jared-kushner-232764 …
-
-
I did not and I will. Apologies if I was behind in the thread. I was reacting more to Maggie Haberman attack, which seemed like an unfair deflection.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Notice how her comments went to “you people” and generalizations explaining how her unqualified opinion is better than the actual facts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I went back to read the story. So politicians shop around for good coverage? Hey Politicians...go on the interviews. State your positions. Allow for questions. Have an open debate. That’s what a free press looks like in a democracy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So Sinclair was on the news this weekend. Maggie Haberman tweeted a story that, given the larger context, may be seen a little differently. So I guess I’m back to the question of why ignore the Sinclair story altogether and attack her? So..still confusedhttps://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/sinclair-broadcast-group-forces-anchors-to-all-read-same-script-1200232003639 …
-
What does the larger context mean? This is why the liberal media in general is losing its battle for respectability.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.