-
-
Replying to @GehringTed @Elegant01300503 and
Same with mumps outbreaks. Occuring in vaccinated with vaccine allegedly wearing off but vaccine companies and govt not always wanting to admit this, coming up with campaign to blame "anti-vaxxers."https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/06/well/family/mumps-makes-a-comeback-even-among-the-vaccinated.html …
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Elegant01300503 and
Do you think there's some scandal here? There's not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GehringTed @Elegant01300503 and
(Well I'm not sure you are King of Declaring What Is A Scandal.) You may be right, but others might disagree. Some would say a CDC senior scientist saying they have defrauded the public on vaccine/autism studies is kind of a scandal. Some might say it's not.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Elegant01300503 and
Plenty to read on that point:https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bad-medicine/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GehringTed @SharylAttkisson and
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/did-a-high-ranking-whistleblower-really-reveal-that-the-cdc-covered-up-proof-that-vaccines-cause-autism-in-african-american-boys/ … The great thing is: You don't decide it's a scandal either. Fortunately the reporting on this is improving! Big step up from when the scare started.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GehringTed @Elegant01300503 and
We agree on that point! (I never claimed to be the decider). But please note you are referencing a well-known pharma astroturf propaganda site. There may be a lot of work ahead of you if you really want to dig into the latest science (not on "http://sciencebasedmedicine.org " lol.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Elegant01300503 and
There's a lot of links on that "whistleblower." You don't like one of them. And if we're going by what things are well known as...isn't that where we started?!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GehringTed @Elegant01300503 and
You lost me there... But thank you for the civil conversation, I appreciate the engagement very much! You sound super smart and are certainly able and welcome to draw your own conclusions based on the research you like.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Elegant01300503 and
I wasn't pointing to the fact you took issue with the "propaganda" that had labeled you as an antivaxxer.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm sure it's me and I'm just denser than usual because it's late but I don't understand that tweet either. Maybe we can continue another time! Thanks once again!
-
-
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Elegant01300503 and
I meant *was*. It's not hard. I don't take seriously your criticism of SBM. And you don't take seriously your reputation as an anti-vaxxer...despite the fact that you're touting a Wakefield documentary (a known fraud http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/01/05/autism.vaccines/index.html …)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.