But honestly, it's too much to digest in a day or even a year. You may just want to forget about it... especially if you're happy with the views you have. No reason to change them.
-
-
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Elegant01300503 and
It's not actually much to digest. I'm happy with my views and encourage others not to be alarmist.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GehringTed @Elegant01300503 and
It's just that if you weren't aware of the CDC scientist who says they have been publishing fraudulent studies on this... and the CDC's admission that vaccines may rarely "trigger" autism, it just suggests there's a lot more you might not know.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @GehringTed @Elegant01300503 and
Same with mumps outbreaks. Occuring in vaccinated with vaccine allegedly wearing off but vaccine companies and govt not always wanting to admit this, coming up with campaign to blame "anti-vaxxers."https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/06/well/family/mumps-makes-a-comeback-even-among-the-vaccinated.html …
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Elegant01300503 and
Do you think there's some scandal here? There's not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GehringTed @Elegant01300503 and
(Well I'm not sure you are King of Declaring What Is A Scandal.) You may be right, but others might disagree. Some would say a CDC senior scientist saying they have defrauded the public on vaccine/autism studies is kind of a scandal. Some might say it's not.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
-
Replying to @GehringTed @Elegant01300503 and
I'm kind of familiar with this. The propagandists pushed to have the documentary removed from the festival. When you see forces trying to censor info rather than debate it, you should generally suspect something may be amiss. This was a big flag, indeed!
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Elegant01300503 and
Why? Scares aren't good. A lot of the early reporting on vaccines based on the fraudulent link between vaccines and autism caused a lot of damage. Why give that airtime?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm especially attracted to facts and stories, as it happens, that powerful forces are trying to censor. That has often led to journalism "gold" in terms of fascinating information unearthed (in my experience).
-
-
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Elegant01300503 and
The reference to facts there is odd. Why continue to tout wakefield?https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136032/ …
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @Elegant01300503 and
There's a difference between censoring something and not giving it a platform.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.