What studies are on the other side, really? Not the CDC--I just linked it.
-
-
There's a lot of links on that "whistleblower." You don't like one of them. And if we're going by what things are well known as...isn't that where we started?!
-
You lost me there... But thank you for the civil conversation, I appreciate the engagement very much! You sound super smart and are certainly able and welcome to draw your own conclusions based on the research you like.
-
I wasn't pointing to the fact you took issue with the "propaganda" that had labeled you as an antivaxxer.
-
I'm sure it's me and I'm just denser than usual because it's late but I don't understand that tweet either. Maybe we can continue another time! Thanks once again!
-
I meant *was*. It's not hard. I don't take seriously your criticism of SBM. And you don't take seriously your reputation as an anti-vaxxer...despite the fact that you're touting a Wakefield documentary (a known fraud http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/01/05/autism.vaccines/index.html …)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.