When it’s ethical to do so, yes. We wouldn’t do a randomized trial to see whether antibiotics are effective for bacterial sepsis for example.
-
-
I went through a similar process. I only heard that austism/vaccine link was crazy and that's what I thought. Then I heard from whistleblowers inside the government and Pharma. They pointed me to surprising facts and studies. So I also had to open my mind based on science.
-
They do understand the underlying science behind autism, ADHD, etc., but for some reason they don’t want to put two&two together. It’s pretty straightforward: vaccination, drugs, etc., interfere with an important biochemical pathway involved in neurological function, methylation.
-
In some, vaccination blocks methylation leading to impaired DNA synthesis, I.e. the body being unable to make all the cells it requires to repair itself. This results in permanent inflammation, impaired immune function, deranged protein synthesis, inability to detox&much more.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thats an inaccurate portrayal. She does nor have access to nor has she done any greater research on this subject than the rest of the medical community. She is one individual with an opinion that the evidence does not support.
-
Wrong. An opinion the pseudoscientific consensus will not support. But then the pseudoscientific consensus is colluding in med science fraud & facilitating a cover up of greater evidence, which finds neurotoxin delivery systems elicit life threatening immune activation events.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.