When it’s ethical to do so, yes. We wouldn’t do a randomized trial to see whether antibiotics are effective for bacterial sepsis for example.
-
-
Replying to @mmelgar09 @2ndfor1st and
Agreed. Ethics extremely important to me, Dr Melgar. On that note, do you believe the “trivial” amount of aluminum adjuvant, utilized in many vaccines & given via IM injection, is safe bc the “dose makes the poison,” despite Aluminum classification as a neurotoxin?
3 replies 6 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @DrMichaelMaster @2ndfor1st and
By definition the dose always makes the poison. Are you aware of any evidence that there is any substance that is poisonous regardless of concentration and dose?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mmelgar09 @2ndfor1st and
So, by definition, aluminum adjuvant which is in many vaccines, is considered “safe?” Yes or no, please.
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @DrMichaelMaster @2ndfor1st and
Yes. The current dose of aluminum found in vaccines makes up only a portion of the total aluminum dose a child recorded from it environment and is considered safe.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @mmelgar09 @DrMichaelMaster and
That should have said "received from its environment"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mmelgar09 @DrMichaelMaster and
As a close relative of several highly educated docs whom I respect very much, I'd like to also point out that our best-educated medical professionals/govt. have frequently proven incorrect in their assessments of safety, etc. These matters, in my view, are evolving "science."
5 replies 17 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @DrMichaelMaster and
And who’s “highly respected” advice would you prefer to take. The expert who has spent their life studying an issue or the person armed with a google search?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mmelgar09 @SharylAttkisson and
This guy spent a lifetime studying & researching while simultaneously falsifying data. Tenure=/=truthhttps://www.thelantern.com/2018/03/ohio-state-researcher-forced-to-resign-after-falsifying-data-in-cancer-research-projects-paid-for-in-part-by-pelotonia-and-stefanie-spielman-cancer-fund/ …
2 replies 4 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @markjarthur @SharylAttkisson and
There are literally 100,000’s scientists in the world. You are alive and living a good life because of them. Yes occasionally there is a bad one and guess who calls them out for it? The scientific community. Your point?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
There's more than one "bad one" but even more so, there are many who are wrong. Not to slight them, there's no shame in being wrong; only in having a closed mind when new facts and theories emerge.
-
-
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @markjarthur and
I agree. That is the very essence of what science is and why it is so successful as opposed to other methods of searching for the truth that reky on dogmatism.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mmelgar09 @SharylAttkisson and
Hard part: perspective on true science. Most of what we are arguing is gov funded. Pure capitalism science is also different than pure investigative rct searching for answers. Vaccines/climate/antibiotic use/current pill of the week/current antipsy of week....tainted?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.