Joe, If you call a timeline of factual information "spewing," it's pretty clear you aren't a consumer of fact-based info; you want the pejorative stuff on only one side. Which is your right-- but then why read myself stuff, and get yourself all worked up?
-
-
Replying to @SharylAttkisson
Ok Sharyl if that is how you want to frame it go right ahead. We both know it was not a “factual” based timeline, it was a conspiratorial timeline. Not going to debate about just disappointed that someone with claims of journalistic integrity would produce such a biased doc.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AlbaneseJoe
If you see conspiracies in facts, that's your prerogative.pic.twitter.com/Z95VmW377V
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
-
-
-
Replying to @OrbiterMovie @AlbaneseJoe
I like
@AlbaneseJoe I don't usually read descriptions names etc and I follow randomly. I welcome dissent as long as it's fairly civil. Joe is smart and funny.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @OrbiterMovie @AlbaneseJoe
That sounds awful. Fortunately I haven't gotten any trolls like that --yet.
3 replies
1 retweet
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.