So you concluded there was no collusion...
-
-
Replying to @GlennInvestor @SharylAttkisson
Glenn, try harder when reading Sharyl’s tweet. Try so much harder.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @jasonrantz @SharylAttkisson
I read and comprehended..thank you for your concern..
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
anyone know NYTimes excuse for this then?https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/us/politics/russia-intelligence-communications-trump.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Are you saying this was disproved?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Youre saying disproved. Itis generally debunked as well as the birther stuff has been debunked.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
(You do know the birther stuff was started by Hillary Clinton supporters)-- but definitely picked up by conservatives.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
a volunteer supporter questioned it...who was dismissed..Trump more than picked up the ball and ran with it...and still has not corrected himself not apologized..
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And why should he, nobodys apologized for this Russia collusion lie.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The Birther thing was way before the collusion thing which has yet to be debunked...Explain the meeting Jr had with the Russian attorney with promises of dirt on Hilary Clinton.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No offense but that certainly isn't illegal even if you find it distasteful. The "dossier" was Russian provided dirt on Trump, for example, paid for by Clinton/DNC and used by FBI. If you think the DTJr meeting was bad, then you must really want a prosecution for the dossier!
-
-
bingo. one was paying for foreign activism to influence an election. the other was a 20min meeting that didnt violate even campaign funding laws.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.