Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
SharylAttkisson's profile
Sharyl Attkisson
Sharyl Attkisson
Sharyl Attkisson
Verified account
@SharylAttkisson

Tweets

Sharyl AttkissonVerified account

@SharylAttkisson

Investigative Journalist @FullMeasureNews *Note* RTs not=endorsement; RTs may be interesting, silly, wrong, outrageous. Question authority. Think for yourself.

Washington, DC
SharylAttkisson.com
Joined October 2010

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Consuella M.  🇺🇸‏ @MConsuella Feb 11

      Consuella M.  🇺🇸 Retweeted Sharyl Attkisson

      The fact is: 17 U.S. Intel Agencies all agree the Russians interfered in 2016 election to help "elect" Trump... https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf …https://twitter.com/SharylAttkisson/status/962821321544650753 …

      Consuella M.  🇺🇸 added,

      Sharyl AttkissonVerified account @SharylAttkisson
      Some reporting innuendo seems to attempt to controversialize or criminalize legal activities. The fact is: politicians from both parties have "ties to Russia"--that appear to be perfectly legal. Even if dubious. http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/373363-democratic-ties-to-russia-are-ample-and-often-ethically-dubious#.WoDIIzWP0Aw.twitter …
      128 replies 14 retweets 53 likes
    2. Stephen Lewis‏ @slewis64517103 Feb 11
      Replying to @MConsuella

      Non sequitur.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    3. Consuella M.  🇺🇸‏ @MConsuella Feb 11
      Replying to @slewis64517103

      Follow the facts.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    4. Stephen Lewis‏ @slewis64517103 Feb 11
      Replying to @MConsuella

      The facts have nothing to do with your non sequitur. The statement made by @SharylAttkisson refers to the legality of business relationships Americans have had with Russians, not to any government interference on US elections. Connecting the two is a non sequitur.

      1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes
    5. Consuella M.  🇺🇸‏ @MConsuella Feb 11
      Replying to @slewis64517103 @SharylAttkisson

      Oh...I understood her statement to be about Russian connections to those on the left as the same as those on the right. Some Russian connections are legitimate. The Russian connections during 2016, that 17 Intel Agencies agree interfered in 2016 election, are illegitimate.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Feb 11
      Replying to @MConsuella @slewis64517103

      What connections? Assuming the Russians interfered, do you know who they were "connected" to in their actions, here in the US? At the time, the Obama administration was dealing with them (in fact Kerry and Lavrov had a record number of contacts in 2016).

      4:47 PM - 11 Feb 2018
      • 12 Likes
      • Common Sense alexis Saxon Keel Esoteric Micah Mike Oxhard Keith Lantz Cori Unland Tay Tay
      1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Consuella M.  🇺🇸‏ @MConsuella Feb 11
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson @slewis64517103

          What connections to Russians??? 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Philly Wiseman‏ @Phillysage Feb 11
          Replying to @MConsuella @SharylAttkisson @slewis64517103

          Maybe read something other than Daily Kos or Huffington Post and get all the facts, not just those that feed your own beliefs. You've twice repeated the debunked 17 intel agencies lie. But whatever... you probably believe the 90% of scientists agree on climate change lie too

          1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes
        4. Consuella M.  🇺🇸‏ @MConsuella Feb 11
          Replying to @Phillysage @SharylAttkisson @slewis64517103

          https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf …

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. Philly Wiseman‏ @Phillysage Feb 11
          Replying to @MConsuella @SharylAttkisson @slewis64517103

          You missed the point... never said there wasn't Russian interference, just that 17 intel agencies didn't come to that agreement. 4 did. The left started the mantra that 17 did to overwhelm anyone that wanted to wait for the evidence to come out. You're using the same tactic

          1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
        6. Consuella M.  🇺🇸‏ @MConsuella Feb 11
          Replying to @Phillysage @SharylAttkisson @slewis64517103

          You missed the point. Never said 17 Intel Agencies make an assessment...I said 17 U.S. Intel Agencies all agree, that includes the U.S. Coast Guard, that Russia interfered in 2016 U.S. presidential election. Whether interference altered the outcome is yet to be determined.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        7. Philly Wiseman‏ @Phillysage Feb 11
          Replying to @MConsuella @SharylAttkisson @slewis64517103

          But that's not accurate. All 17 didn't evaluate it. Read the article I linked. The DNI - that's Clapper and CIA Brennan (both liars)... made that determination and spread it around. 4 agencies reviewed it and made the determination. So I submit you're continuing the tactic

          1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
        8. Consuella M.  🇺🇸‏ @MConsuella Feb 11
          Replying to @Phillysage @SharylAttkisson @slewis64517103

          Not evaluate it...All 17 agree.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        9. Philly Wiseman‏ @Phillysage Feb 11
          Replying to @MConsuella @SharylAttkisson @slewis64517103

          Just not worth it. You're stuck... 4 evaluated it. No proof that other could agree or disagree. How can they agree when they didn't evaluate. You're logic and analysis is flawed. I'm done - just not worth the effort.

          1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes
        10. 1 more reply

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info