Some reporting innuendo seems to attempt to controversialize or criminalize legal activities. The fact is: politicians from both parties have "ties to Russia"--that appear to be perfectly legal. Even if dubious.http://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/373363-democratic-ties-to-russia-are-ample-and-often-ethically-dubious#.WoDIIzWP0Aw.twitter …
-
-
Oh am I. Your gymnastics in defense of this administration is troubling to me. But you’re a big girl. You know your audience. But unlike them I read extensively every day. Many sources. Even you from time to time. But you fell off the beam. Admittedly it’s hard to walk
-
2/2 In other words, if a reporter finds fact, those opposed to the finding assume reporter is biased. MSM is so convoluted, we don't actually appreciate good journalism when we see it!
-
These may be facts but they’re besides the point. Lots of people do business with Russia. So what? This is whatsboutism. Like octopus ink. I don’t expect you to agree but I do expect civility
-
When you see facts as "gymnastics in defense of this administration," I'm afraid you're giving yourself away. I see why my reporting wouldn't be your cup of tea, but there are many media outlets that have just what you want!
-
I admired your work when you went after Obama with Fast and Furious and the battery company. ABC.. but this doesn’t compute for me. Whatever. We do not agree
-
So when you see yourself in agreement with the facts in my reporting, you like it; but when I raise facts you don't like, you don't like it. You're not all that unusual I that respect. I just look for underserved stories and angles and there I go.
-
No. That is the wrong interpretation It is defensive. I’m not unschooled in conservative ideas. I worked withLou Dobb and Stuart Varney. My father was quite conservative. I just see a rather obvious penchant to pull in a fact pattern that suits an agenda. My opinion. Discard it
-
Agreed. Same here. Didn't mean you to feel defensive. Appreciate the dialog. You're entitled to your opinions.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Your article is a hatchet job. Saying Ukraine, not Russia because where is Yanukovich today? Know what happened in the 2004 Ukrainian election when Russia was determined to have meddled?
-
You’re right. Quoting the facts is absolutely a hatchet job. You got me.pic.twitter.com/wVHYMeZv20
-
Question: Where is Viktor Yanukovych, the former Ukrainian President who Manafort worked very closely with, located today?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.