The result of the memo will be a release and investigation of the entire history of the process and FISA use. I suspect this is equivalent to putting all on notice the facts will not go away. Not a vindication, but definitely forces the truth out and sunshine!
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Am I the only one who sees that the FBI dropped a criminal investigation that undeniably established HRC’s recklessness of national security, yet managed simultaneously to convince themselves that Trump was too much of a national-security risk to be president.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
If
@SallyQYates found it so important to warn Trump about Flynn why didn’t she feel the same about Page? She wanted the Title1 to continue. -
Excellent point Sherri! But of course, Yates is crooked, like Holder, Comey, Lynch, Clinton and Obama.
-
Agreed... It makes my stomach churn
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe z juj iz part o z konspirasi
-
Absolutely! We are living through a very disturbing time in American history!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Fact is
@FBI cannot go into#FISC with an application for#TelTap that includes affidavits with massive omission of facts that#DNC_HRC funded#Steele_Doc presented as evidence & that doc is in#Infancy of#Validation@realDonaldTrump@DonaldJTrumpJrThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What bull didthey use to spy on you and Rosen?
-
Rosen's must have been similar to this type, as his parents were also included. Sharyl's, bizarrely, even effected, or should I say infected her computer
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Obama DOJ has a history of bending the rules to warrant spying on perceived enemies.https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/clark-judge/2013/05/23/irs-ap-and-james-rosen-scandals-strike-at-the-first-amendment …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thank you, Sharyl, for your succinct and incisive analysis enabling ordinary Americans to understand what happened.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The usual legal standard for a warrant is merely "probably cause." What standard, precisely, do the Woods Procedures require? You mention 'verification' but at what level? "probable" or "beyond a reasonable doubt" or something else?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.