Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
SharylAttkisson's profile
Sharyl Attkisson
Sharyl Attkisson
Sharyl Attkisson
Verified account
@SharylAttkisson

Tweets

Sharyl AttkissonVerified account

@SharylAttkisson

Investigative Journalist @FullMeasureNews *Note* RTs not=endorsement; RTs may be interesting, silly, wrong, outrageous. Question authority. Think for yourself.

Washington, DC
SharylAttkisson.com
Joined October 2010

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Feb 3

      Sharyl Attkisson Retweeted John Sitkiewicz

      So if I have it straight: British former spy quoted Russia spies in "dossier" which was really political oppo research pd for by anti-Trump Repubs then DNC/Hillary camp w/false/unverified info, then FBI pd $ for it & used it to get wiretap on US citizen. Comey et al. signed off.https://twitter.com/Jrock41S/status/960003545876623360 …

      Sharyl Attkisson added,

      John Sitkiewicz @Jrock41S
      Replying to @SharylAttkisson
      Unrelated, but very curious that no one in the media seems to care that a foreign (former) MI-6 British Spy meddled in the 2016 election.
      310 replies 2,620 retweets 4,683 likes
    2. Buster's View‏ @lkoneal Feb 3
      Replying to @SharylAttkisson @RichardReese3

      No, you don't have it right. You have it distorted and spun. Which makes me think you don't want to, since you used to be a much better investigative reporter than this.

      9 replies 1 retweet 10 likes
      Sharyl Attkisson‏Verified account @SharylAttkisson Feb 3
      Replying to @lkoneal @RichardReese3

      If you say so. Instead of attacking, why not tell me your version?

      8:41 PM - 3 Feb 2018
      • 4 Retweets
      • 42 Likes
      • Greg Cranford ? MIX789 Kabuki Circus RhondaLikesToQuilt InSearchOfTruth October5150 Horn_Of_Zeese Funkasaurus_Rex
      11 replies 4 retweets 42 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Buster's View‏ @lkoneal Feb 3
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson @RichardReese3

          That really wasn't an attack. I'm just disappointed that you of all ppl would do this. You know the memo puts a certain construction on things that may or may not be supported by underlying sources. Especially with someone as biased as Nunes, who hasn't even read them.

          10 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
        3. Richard Reese‏ @RichardReese3 Feb 3
          Replying to @lkoneal @SharylAttkisson

          Nunes HAS read the underlying sources!! What is wrong with you. Those sources gave rise to the memo. I suppose you're all for release of everything, right? I am and I'm sure Ms. Attkisson does. Or do you approve of DOJ/FBI hiding behind secrecy while leaking to the press?

          3 replies 0 retweets 14 likes
        4. Buster's View‏ @lkoneal Feb 3
          Replying to @RichardReese3 @SharylAttkisson

          He admits that he has not read the material himself.

          7 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        5. Carol Lambert‏ @carollambert3 Feb 4
          Replying to @lkoneal @RichardReese3 @SharylAttkisson

          Only a few people were allowed to view the underlying reports. The committee discussed who would see it and they chose Gowdy (former prosecutor) and 2 investigators who took notes and reported back to Nunes.

          2 replies 2 retweets 15 likes
        6. Richard Reese‏ @RichardReese3 Feb 4
          Replying to @carollambert3 @lkoneal @SharylAttkisson

          You are correct. I misspoke earlier in one of my replies. And the reason only Gowdy and 2 staffers could see is because the FBI/DOJ would only that number to see it - and in a designated room. FBI is to blame for all the information that is withheld.

          0 replies 1 retweet 6 likes
        7. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Buster's View‏ @lkoneal Feb 3
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson @RichardReese3

          I don't see, at this point, how we know we have the truth without the classified source materials being released. Neither transition team partisan Nines nor Schiff and co. can be trusted as honest brokers here.

          1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
        3. Richard Reese‏ @RichardReese3 Feb 3
          Replying to @lkoneal @SharylAttkisson

          And every R and conservative I know is for such a release! Which Rs are against it? Congress had to threaten a lawsuit to get the source documents FFS!

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        4. Buster's View‏ @lkoneal Feb 3
          Replying to @RichardReese3 @SharylAttkisson

          I don't know who's against it. I do know very few have read the pertinent info, including Nunes. Also know Trump could have declassified the fisa warrant applications, released them, and cleared all of this up any time since taking office.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. 1 more reply
        1. naturelover‏ @starlady24 Feb 9
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson @lkoneal @RichardReese3

          You didn’t answer her question,Buster? Sharyl stated the facts, you disputed them, yet you stated nothing that disputed Sharyl’s #facts! She is an investigative reporter! Gowdy read “everything”,he wrote the report.Nunes has seen enough to know 4 certain.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Buster's View‏ @lkoneal Feb 3
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson @RichardReese3

          Last thing, it seems deceptive to leave out Steele's excellent reputation in IC, his work on cracking FIFA scandal, etc. Also left out his years on the Russia desk for MI6, which is why he had developed sources there.

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. mark perks‏ @Zigandzag101 Feb 3
          Replying to @lkoneal @SharylAttkisson @RichardReese3

          Well Steele was told by fbi not to come back to them and it is known that Steele didn’t want Trump as president and would help to do anything to make sure he wasn’t, they could have made the memo 200 pages! It’s a summary of what fbi did to get fisa warrant, using fake dossier!

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Buster's View‏ @lkoneal Feb 3
          Replying to @Zigandzag101 @SharylAttkisson @RichardReese3

          Perhaps Steele had very good reason to believe Trump should not be president based on information he was getting from his sources. We don't actually know if he held that strong opinion before his research into Trump.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. mark perks‏ @Zigandzag101 Feb 4
          Replying to @lkoneal @SharylAttkisson @RichardReese3

          Well if you don’t find a problem with a British spy deciding who should be our president then maybe you shouldn’t vote! Americans decide who our president is! His sources? Who where they? How much were they paid? Really can’t believe your an American that posted that! It’s stupid

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
        6. End of conversation
        1. New conversation
        2. Richard Reese‏ @RichardReese3 Feb 3
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson @lkoneal

          Can anyone tell me how the Mueller investigation is not impacted in ANY way by the FISA fiasco like the Ds and Trump haters claim? Isn't the fact that Yates, Comes, McCabe and Rosenstein look bad this enough to taint current investigation???????

          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. 1 more reply
        1. naturelover‏ @starlady24 Feb 9
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson @lkoneal @RichardReese3

          Another obe,Buster. The dossier was full of mistakes. Steele was either very unprofessional,sloppy,or someone else helped write it.pic.twitter.com/fNrQppAQFc

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. naturelover‏ @starlady24 Feb 9
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson @lkoneal @RichardReese3

          Here you go,Buster.pic.twitter.com/xyZimuxq1K

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. naturelover‏ @starlady24 Feb 9
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson @lkoneal @RichardReese3

          Steele’s “excellent” reputation is in tatters. You seem to disregard the fact the FBI fired him for going behind their back,running to news media! It wasn’t info t/he found & verified,it was 3rd,4th hand unverified sources in Russia‼️

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Brenda Brockett‏ @ProudinMT Feb 4
          Replying to @SharylAttkisson @lkoneal @RichardReese3

          @SharylAttkisson, do you know who appointed the FISA Judge that agreed to issue the warrant? How deep does this go?

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Buster's View‏ @lkoneal Feb 4
          Replying to @ProudinMT @SharylAttkisson @RichardReese3

          Yes, actually. FISA court judges are appointed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, who since 2005 has been John Roberts. Of course their original appt. to federal courts may have been by either R or D presidents. So Roberts is part of this conspiracy to take down Trump?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Brenda Brockett‏ @ProudinMT Feb 5
          Replying to @lkoneal @SharylAttkisson @RichardReese3

          It was a simple question? Snark is not necessary.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        5. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info