Why did the FBI Director testify under oath there had been no abuse of surveillance authority ("702") when mounds of evidence proves otherwise?http://thehill.com/opinion/civil-rights/365131-fbi-chiefs-claim-on-surveillance-abuse-doesnt-fit-the-evidence …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sharyl, It would make my follow-Friday if you would follow me. You tweeted me back once years ago when the flag in my twitter logo used to wave behind me. My tweet was about giving you moral support at CBS, when you were starting into the Benghazi story.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hmmmph. Nunes stated today he found no abuses with 702 and he made it clear to his colleagues. Interesting. Thanks!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.