The FISA court itself has pointed to egregious abuses of 702 surveillance law and bad acts (said the court) by our intel agencies. It's a question of who is responsible, not whether there were bad acts.https://twitter.com/SharylAttkisson/status/958810328497876992 …
-
-
They rewrote the dossier and version 2 was Fusion GPS. They added a British spy angle and doctored it up
-
Tweet unavailable
-
If it was a convincing application, yes. We don't know what the judge was told. Maybe there were other facts shown to the court we're not privy to. Or maybe the application misled the judge.
-
Agree. We don't know if Ohr was involved w approval or the recused Flynn judge approved or if FISC judge was duped. I have a feeling it was the latter since the FISC court admonished the Obama admin last May for surveillance abuse of Americans.
-
IE: was FISC judge dirty and in on it or was he/she duped. That is the question.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think the court was duped
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If it's Judge Contrares they need to take another look at the Flynn case.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.