Maybe because there is evidence that Trump engaged in a conspiracy and/or obstructed justice, and there was no evidence that Hillary committed a crime. That would pretty much explain it, right?
-
-
Replying to @EW_HR @SharylAttkisson and
FBI and Comey plainly said she committed crimes that people are locked up for. But because she said she didn't mean to, they chose not to prosecute. Meanwhile they prosecute others that didn't mean to.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @triggeredmedia @SharylAttkisson and
As I've said other places - she has admitted error. I think it is debatable whether or not we should prosecute people (at any level) for policy breaches. Is using the private server really grounds for jail? I see where you could say yes. I'd say no.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EW_HR @triggeredmedia and
I have all kinds of conflicting thoughts. Once political interests target and prosecute other political interests it's a slippery slope (on both sides). However, alleged crimes probably shouldn't be overlooked just because they were committed by opposing political interests.
4 replies 12 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @EW_HR and
Failure in any way to uphold the Rule of Law diminishes its very principles. There is a reason that Justice is blind. ALL must be held to the same standard.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MemphisMeteor @SharylAttkisson and
Gotcha. Please identify someone else who was prosecuted for improperly securing emails.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EW_HR @SharylAttkisson and
Perhaps you missed my point. Reread and reflect.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MemphisMeteor @SharylAttkisson and
Sorry if I'm being thick. What, in your opinion, standards and or people are not being treated consistently?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EW_HR @MemphisMeteor and
I was taking about people prosecuted for improperly handling classified information, like Hillary did, only not as bad as Hillary did. Seems like you have to change the law and say that's not a crime or treat it like a crime for anyone who commits it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @SharylAttkisson @MemphisMeteor and
So you see no difference between "mishandling" and consciously leaking or sharing? I just don't think there's been prosecutions short of the conscious effort to share or leak. Am I wrong?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
From what I understand the law doesn't excuse egregious mishandling of classified info, esp when top govt official repeatedly trained and aware of how to handle it. I do think the criminal penalty might be different for someone who had nefarious intentions vs. somebody who 1/2
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.